<p>“its reactionary for sure the guy didnt wnt change unlike lange…
last 3 i got 770 750 760”
lol so that means you got questions wrong… meaning it’s entirely plausible that your answer to this question is wrong too.
do you want to tell us what the question was?</p>
<p>guys, please tell me the marble question was 6/11
i missed that stupid median question already ><
anybody know which math section was experimental?</p>
<p>@miami was the question about tone??</p>
<p>so that’s 2 people for skepticism and 2 people for direct quote…</p>
<hr>
<p>was the marble question the very first grid in?</p>
<p>It’s skepticism. Where did he quote “objective” from? Why would you even need to quote the word “objective”?
I don’t remember a question about reactionary. What was the question asking exactly?</p>
<p>Definitely skepticism, I mean the whole passage was about skepticism against these photographs. Direct Quotes was probably meant to be a “trap choice.”</p>
<p>What was the reactionary question about? i do not remember it…</p>
<p>The reactionary question was the one on the top of the page of the documentary photos section right after the question where “untenable” was the answer. it was choice A but I think I got it wrong because I was going to change it to “subjective” but ran out of time</p>
<p>but what was the question?</p>
<p>Also can you guys explain to me how she treated poor to rich was analogous to film critics doing something?? I just had loads of trouble on that one section… :/</p>
<p>@miami I think it referred to a line and asked for tone I’m not sure…</p>
<p>Oh I remember picking subjective as an answer choice to a question. What was the question?</p>
<p>Its Skeptisism for sure. You dont quote one word in a sarcastic tone.</p>
<p>I put subjective for something too…</p>
<p>I think the question, if I recall correctly, was that “Lange’s pictures were inherantly ___” then yeah, it’s gotta be subjective</p>
<p>@megan, the poor to rich thing as I saw it was her using the same technique on a different subject
So that would be like the film critic using her technique to critique novels</p>
<p>anybody get a question about a graph with a horizontal line? it asked for some kind of intersection</p>
<p>I thought when she said she looked at the poor with the same eyes she looked at with the rich meant she was equally skillful in both so I thought it was musician who could play two instruments equally well…maybe I’m just biased since I play an instrument. </p>
<p>oh well good bye 700 CR…</p>
<p>if any of u paid attention o the quotes dor the photographer who believed that photos shd be objective the author quoted “objective” from him and later requoted him in the passage near the end</p>
<p>Megan I put that too. I think we are right!</p>
<p>@Vanilla I think it’s debatable because I had a hard time choosing between the two answers. And CR isn’t my strongest, either I understand the passage really well and get everything or it’s just hard for me :/</p>
<p>Do you use the same technique playing the piano when you play the violin? It doesn’t emphasize the fact that Lange who portrayed rich people in her unique way, used that same technique to portray poor people. Movie critic writes movie reviews in her classic style or whatever and then uses that same style to review books. Two different entities, same style. Music one indicates that to play the piano you use the same skills to play the violin, which you don’t obviously. Now if the music one said like, a musician that plays the piano in a classical style and plays the violin in a classical style as well then that would work.</p>
<p>Its saying that its the same task at hand, but each has its differences.</p>