<p>Was the reading curve always this harsh?
I recall that sometimes you can get an 800 with 1 wrong?</p>
<p>I missed three questions and ended up with a 750.
Is this normal?</p>
<p>The test’s questions were probably easier, more people got them right while they were experimental sections, so one cannot miss as many compared to all other tests to receive the same score. Missing three means -4 raw, usually its a 770 or 760.</p>
<p>That was the confusing part for me.
I remember people complaining about how difficult
the architecture passage was compared to passages that appeared
in previous tests. I was honestly not expecting a 750 with -3.</p>
<p>Same spicy… When I saw I had a 750 I thought I had gotten like 5 wrong or something, which was a deviation from my normal -2 on practice tests… I couldn’t believe it when I found it I only got 3 wrong to bring me down to a 750. But whatever, I’m taking the January just for critical reading haha</p>