<p>No comment.</p>
<p>The intrinsic beauty of this thread topic speaks for itself.</p>
<p>It is kinda like rock, paper, scissors isn’t it? I mean the hammer gets the cuffs…love it.</p>
<p>Google “money laundering”</p>
<p>There goes another felon.</p>
<p>What I find odd is Delay’s smiling mug shot. His photo looks more like a campaign shot than a mug. And what about the little sign every other booked person is holding - how did he avoid that? And where’s the side shot? Special treatment, all the way to jail.</p>
<p>Too funny, I’m loving it. Another faux prosecution, and I’ll bet the next person you see in a mug shot situation in this case will be the prosecutor, and he won’t be smiling. DeLay knows what’s up here, and Ronnie Earl will be dealt with appropriately.<a href=“CNSNews.com”>quote</a> - There it is, front and center on the Democratic National Committee’s webpage: a full-color mug shot of Rep. Tom DeLay, not bad as mug shots go, with the caption, “DeLay Booked.”</p>
<p>The Texas Republican is smiling, dressed in a suit and wearing his House pin. Unlike most mug shots, the photograph being circulated on the Internet does not include written information at the bottom, so it looks more like an ordinary snapshot than a mug shot. That bothers many of the bloggers on the Democrat’s “Kicking Ass” website. Some complained that the official mug shot “doesn’t look real – no ID markings, no booking numbers, etc.” Others wanted to see the profile shot. “I want a copy of the warrent [sic] for the back of a t-shirt and his mug on the front,” one Democrat wrote. Others indicated they’d like to wipe the smile off DeLay’s face.
[/quote]
<a href=“http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200510\POL20051021b.html[/url]”>http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200510\POL20051021b.html</a></p>
<p>
Sounds like special treatment to me too. First Earl indicts him on a law that didn’t exist, then he rushes to get an indictment on money laundering and the grand jury refuses to indict, so he quickly convenes a third grand jury to get his indictment (but now admits that he doesn’t have a document that is a key part of the evidence.) All the while, Earl is the star of a documentary that he is participating in making about the downfall of Tom Delay and gives speeches to the Democrat organization about how he is targeting Tom Delay. Oh, and the judge that is scheduled to hear the case has contributed to Move-on.org. </p>
<p>This is the kind of special treatment that nightmares are made of.</p>
<p>Will Ronnie Earl face any consequences for his behavior?</p>
<p>I think he will face serious consequences. I said when this thing first came out that I thought he had finally gone too far, and would end up disbarred. Perhaps prosecuted. We shall see. He’s picked a phony fight with really tough brawler. <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showpost.php?p=1261818&postcount=8[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showpost.php?p=1261818&postcount=8</a></p>
<p>Yup. He might get elected to Congress. ;)</p>
<p>Not in Texas. DeLay redistricted it, remember? That’s what this is all about. ;)</p>
<p>Does anyone else wonder if maybe, IRL, Funding Father is Hannity and Driver is Ann Coulter?</p>
<p>I’m actually Lynne Cheney, but please don’t tell.</p>
<p>mini is john kerry</p>
<p>good one, driver.</p>
<p>I only wish that I were Hannity - rich, young and handsome. Well, at least one out three isn’t bad.</p>
<p>a poor old guy</p>
<p>actually, I think mini is closer to Michael Moore.</p>
<p>ff, that leaves handsome, huh?</p>
<p>I actually thought Driver was Hannity. When I read that Driver was a woman it took three days to get over it, because I didn’t think a woman could possibly be that mean spirited and nasty. Ah, that’s right…just like Ann Coulter. Sorry driver, but you really do give one that “macho” feel when unseen. Your views are decidedly “fat cat” conservative male. You may want to think about that…ummm</p>
<p>Laura–
glad to see that you don’t subscribe to any silly gender stereotypes.</p>