Delay Arrest Warrant Issued

[itstoomuch]

<p>I’m probably mistaken, I thought that mug shots are to be taken with a neither a smile or frown and as neutral as possible. If this is so, the publicized photo is either a non approved and preferential mug shot or a PR shot that has nothing to do with his guilt or innocence in a state matter.</p>

[driver]

<p>One final latte reference: I would urge offended parties to check out the current email address of Harvard’s most famous (infamous?) conservative professor:</p>

<p>Professor Harvey C. Mansfield
Littauer M-31, 495-3333, hmansfield@latte.harvard.edu
Political philosophy; American constitutionalism.</p>

<p>Apparently, he likes the stuff as well. :)</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.seo.harvard.edu/resprog/r16.html[/url]”>http://www.seo.harvard.edu/resprog/r16.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

[simba]

<p>driver, yeah, but more the chiken delay whines, more guiltier he looks. Scalia was ‘entertained’ by the defendent in his court and I didn’t see you whinning about that.</p>

[fundingfather]

<p>

But who and what we give money too does not follow whether or not a judge will be fair.

So, in other words, if Harriet Miers or any other future Supreme Court nominee gives money to Right to Life organizations it is totally out of bounds to bring that up in the hearings?</p>

[kluge]

<p>FountainSiren:

Kluge, Laura,</p>

<p>I hear Edward R Morrow is back on top: What was he famous for saying?</p>

<p>um, ‘have you no…name?’ Something like that. Anyhow, I would have said “class”.

</p>

<p>Driver:

perhaps one of you bored geniuses could attempt to respond with something other than predictable kneejerk triteness, yourselves.

</p>

<p>FountainSiren:

</p>

[kluge]

<p>FountainSiren:

Kluge, Laura,</p>

<p>I hear Edward R Morrow is back on top: What was he famous for saying?</p>

<p>um, ‘have you no…name?’ Something like that. Anyhow, I would have said “class”.

</p>

<p>Driver:

perhaps one of you bored geniuses could attempt to respond with something other than predictable kneejerk triteness, yourselves.

</p>

<p>FountainSiren:

…

</p>

[itstoomuch]

<h1>44. I thought we were discussing Delay? A person accused of a capital crime, can ask for a judge that is opposed to capital punishment, but that person should not expect that request be granted. We would expect that judge to be fair, listen to the arguments, and then make the decisions with the first decision being guilty or not proven guilty.</h1>

<p>But to answer your Q; The senate has the obligations to ask what ever questions they may ask. And if she donates $ to XYZ organization, so what. I expect any judge to be fair and impartial until the facts and merits are presented. </p>

<p>Wouldn’t you agree FF?</p>

[simba]

<p>FF would never agree. He also thinks that Scalia junket was OK too.</p>

[itstoomuch]

<p>Simba: Sorry to pop your expectations, but I see no harm in Scalia’s junket.</p>