<p>There is a saying in the field of construction bidding that when you submit a low bid which is significantly lower than the next bid, the difference between the two is considered money left on the table.</p>
<p>In a way, thats how Im feeling about the college admissions process right now; that my D has left money - or in this case admittances - on the table. </p>
<p>From reading threads on this site, I can say my D is a classic BWRK. Mid-1400s SATs (her main weakness), state-level recognition in one talent, a bunch of ECs including yearbook editor, a varsity sport, a couple of officer positions in clubs, a 97+ average, and 2/300 class rank. A strong writer and a happy kid. </p>
<p>We spent a lot of time looking at colleges and decided to go mostly with LACs. She applied to 7 schools, including Colgate, Hamilton, U of R (matches), Franklin & Marshall and an in-state college (safeties), Dartmouth and Williams (reaches).</p>
<p>She ended up getting offers for the top scholarships from the schools at which she was accepted that have provided aid information. She was waitlisted by Williams today and I expect a rejection or waitlist from Dartmouth.</p>
<p>She never expected a happy ending from her reaches. What I still cant believe is the offers from the matches. How can she be in the top few % of the applicants for Colgate and Hamilton and be at the bottom of the pack (or below) at Williams and Dartmouth? I guess Im saying that we must have missed some other tier of schools that would have been more of a match for her. She will end up going to one of these matches and Im very proud of her. Shell have a fabulous time, Im sure. And we can afford it. But she always wanted to go to a school where she wasnt in the top of the class. She wanted to be surrounded by kids who were as accomplished or preferably more accomplished than she.</p>
<p>So, did we miss some other schools in between? Did we leave some admittances on the table by not doing our homework? I am feeling a little like I let D down.</p>
<p>Ill be doing this again in three years with my S, wholl have similar stats, I think. Any comments?</p>