<p>I spent 95 percent of my time in an environment that is TOTALLY dominated by Apple product. I have used and owned most the Apple products that are purportedly so popular today. Some aspects are great, and some are truly wonderful. On the other hand, not everything is perfect, and that is something that the Apple fanboys are not prepared to admit nor accept. Never did and never will. </p>
<p>The comparison between the Apple products and the ROW is not an apples to oranges. With Apple, not only do you buy the software, you also have to buy the hardware and adopt a completely closed ecosystem. If Apple were producing clothes, they would be a one-size fit-all with a black and beige of choices. It would be pretty but everyone looked the same. A living parody of its own Big Brother commercial. </p>
<p>What some tend to forget is the differences with the Microsoft or Linux world where the choice of HARDWARE is quasi unlimited as the software is licensed. In so many words, you have a choice of super cheap computers as well as “tricked” up machines with thousands of dollars spent on graphic cards or memory banks. On the other hand, buying a Mac is mostly akin to buy a DVR or a microwave. You will simply never open it up and upgrade it. </p>
<p>Lastly, for people working on “not fun” PCs, you might consider that the machines you work on have been crippled to fit a company policy and have the workers focus on specific tasks. It is not unheard of to have companies using software that is a decade old. Windows XP anyone? </p>
<p>In the meantime, when looking strictly at computers, the share of Apple running OSX remains incredibly small in comparison to the Windows environment. As expected and planned, it remains incredibly small in the low end market of the consumer market. And there are plenty of reasons for that. </p>
<p>As far as the story of how a 1984 Apple product transitioned, it is not a straight line. Chances are that, without the success of the iPod and other mobile products that rejuvenated the marker, Apple might have become a non-event and only served a market where it had a strong following, or where it could cajole its way in. It is easy to confuse the success of IOS and the position of Apple in a new world of mobile communications and computing. </p>
<p>Right now, the “dialogues” are not about Yosemite versus Windows 8.1 as much as iPhone6 plus versus Samsung Note. It is all about who was right in pushng the phablets and why Jobs did not continue to offer the biggest screen in the way the iPhone did in its first iteration. Now, we have that 5.5 screen that is still not as bright as the Samsung QHD, the camera is still not the best, the iPhone still lacks an expansion slot for memory or connectivity, it is still unable to run multiple applications beyond the spilt screen, it still will choke on Flash sites, and it is still lacks a removable battery. </p>
<p>None of the above wll stop people from buying it and repeat how their choice were the best. It is human to support our own choices --and perhaps brag about them-- but that does not mean it ought to be true! </p>