<p>Having gotten a few rejection letters, I’m noticing differences in the language and wording of each. Some are fairly positive (“great potential,” “would love to receive a transfer application,” etc) while others are more vague and formal (“x number of applicants for y number of spots”) Is this standard? I would assume so, yet it still seems weird that comparable and similar schools would send such differing rejection letters.</p>
<p>It’s not as if there’s a MS Word wizard template for “rejection letters”. How do you think they are generated?</p>
<p>They all have the same point: NO!</p>
<p>^ roflcopter</p>
<p>Yeah, they’re all different, but does it really matter?</p>
<p>of course not, and obviously they do have the same point. After getting rejected from lots of ballet intensives though, I know that some places send a ‘nice’ rejection letter and a ‘mean’ rejection letter, depending on their opinion of the dancer. Assuming this isn’t true for colleges of course, just wondering why any school would bother to go above and beyond ‘no.’</p>