<p>ya but how much money are we gonna spend now to do research for a replacement test?</p>
<p>and are we gonna get rid og those “educators” who approved the idea in the first place?</p>
<p>I dont think it was a good test
I think it is ridiculously expensive for a test where they do not release the " results’ only the scores.
THe only time you even get to see your childs results, is if you make an appt- and then you are not allowed to take notes of your childs efforts.</p>
<p>Of course I am in Seattle where we are closing schools to save money, but we are going to be spending $1.5 million on upgrading the ventilation system in a building that is less than 10 years old.</p>
<p>Way back when, one of my children (early grade school at the time) was a guinea pig for an early test run of what was to become the WASL. Terrible results and I went to the teacher to discuss my concerns about my child’s low score. She assured me the test was flawed, experimental, yadda yadda yadda… I shouldn’t worry. They should have dumped it then.</p>
<p>For some reason, public schools in Oregon had and perhaps still have, a stronger foundation and better results than the educational systems in Washington.</p>
<p>Classic liberal Washington State stupidity. Spend a FORTUNE researching, designing, and administering a test that will measure your third-rate educational system against itself. Build a huge bureaucracy behind it. Ignore the cost savings you could have enjoyed from the beginning by instead using a NATIONALLY NORMED test which already exists (one that would actually prepare your students to at least be better equipped to compete against the rest of the country).</p>
<p>But here comes the PRICELESS part… When your huge fiasco fails miserably, make a plan to take the same pathetic path all over again. Spend more money designing a new useless, inefficient tool. Fail another generation of students. Push for more redistributed wealth to pay for your folly.</p>