Do boys have an unfair advantage in college admissions?

<p>Hey everyone,
My name is Meg Hemmingson and for my college writing class in Elon University I decided to write a paper focusing on the way college admissions boards often pass over girls for boys in an attempt to even out the gender ratios of their schools. Sometimes it doesn’t matter how talented and intelligent a girl is; she might not get admitted to her first choice school if the admissions boards decide they’d rather have a boy to increase diversity. In this paper, I tried to expose some of the faults of this logic and express my hopes that their systems and attitudes will change soon.</p>

<hr>

<p>College admissions boards have long been concerned about the number of men admitted to their respective universities, as the number of men attending college in the United States has been steadily declining over the past few years. Some education and political leaders have gone so far as to claim that the education system has declared a “war on boys”, one that must be corrected through means similar to those used to keep racial ratios in affirmative action. However, it is far more important for colleges to give every applicant an equal opportunity to be admitted to the university, regardless of any socioeconomic factor, especially gender. Diversity, while an important factor on any campus, should not be placed in higher priority than helping out those students that most deserve an opportunity to further their education; college admissions boards should keep in mind that young women deserve an education just as much as young men do, and so not give the men an advantage based on factors beyond their control.</p>

<p>Men do not always deserve the attention they get from college admissions boards, and the women are the ones who suffer as a result of this unfair treatment. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, men make up only about 43% of all university students, and so college admissions boards are always working to bring up their university’s percentage of men in order to try and balance out the gender ratio. However, this means that, unfortunately, highly talented female applicants are sometimes passed over in favor of less-qualified males, who are selected simply for diversity’s sake. Women often have to work harder just to be noticed by college boards, since men automatically get more attention, since college admissions boards are, after all, trying to maintain some semblance of gender parity on campus; it’s then often harder for women to make the cut in the more selective colleges. Because college graduates generally go on to be wealthy and high-up members of society, this form of giving men preferential treatment could well be seen as a form of sexism; the bias college admissions has towards men helps them keep an advantage that they have had in contemporary society for the past 200 years.</p>

<p>This disparity is unfortunate, especially since many studies show that girls have been working harder in school over the past 30 years, improving their overall grades at a much higher rate than boys are. This industriousness doesn’t only occur in college, either: from elementary school, girls are the students who generally do the best work in class, and so are best conditioned to be the better students by the time they are old enough to enroll in college. However, this could be due to an unconscious bias that teachers and curricula have had toward young girls for the past 15 years or so. Around that time, a report called “How Schools Shortchange Girls” was published, detailing how teachers failed to address the academic needs of girls and paid more attention to boys, causing the girls to fall behind. Since that time, the schools’ curricula have been reworked to better address girls’ academic needs, without ignoring the boys. This restructuring of America’s curriculum has not made the boys fall any further behind; it’s just that the girls are improving their performance much faster than the boys are. Girls are also more likely to get involved in the arts than boys are, and less likely to have behavioral problems or be put into special education classes; these qualities definitely help out when filling out college applications. With the girls working harder than ever before in school for the chance to go to college and catch up with the men in the workplace, it only seems fair that they should get every opportunity they deserve to get into the best colleges, to correct the pay inequality that already exists for women in American society.</p>

<p>True, colleges don’t use such blatant methods as affirmative action to boost the proportion of males on their campuses; they often use more passive recruiting techniques like marketing to get males more interested in their schools. A few years ago, Elon University in North Carolina started a small engineering program and moved its football team to NCAA division I to attract more male applicants; Greg L. Zaiser, Elon’s dean of admissions, also says that they created a more strict deadline for applications to motivate the normally less-conscientious male applicants to be more on top of the admissions process. Some colleges have even changed the palettes of their brochures from pastel to primary, in an attempt to make their schools look more appealing to boys. But these marketing campaigns alone are not enough for colleges to get the male ratios they need; they must also “quietly tweak their standards to give male applicants a leg up” in the admissions process, according to editorialist Robin Wilson. In other words, sometimes the deciding factor for choosing students comes down to a simple matter of gender. Some school administrators, such as Towson University’s Deborah Leather, are worried that the imbalance of the sexes in schools will create “a very different society in a generation or two”, and thus are trying to keep their campuses balanced between the sexes to prevent this from happening. The process of marketing the school towards boys, however, is much preferable to giving male applicants an advantage in the admissions process, because this way, young men get to choose which schools they are interested in attending and they aren’t given as much as an advantage over girls interested in the same schools.</p>

<p>While some may feel that giving boys an advantage in the college admissions process is merely a way to correct the gender imbalance that currently exists, the opposite is actually true, as it is women who need to be given more advantages. Women still don’t earn as much in the workplace as men do; and if they are given a quality higher education, some of this might be reversed. The best way for college admissions to select students would be for neither gender to be given any sort of weight in the admissions process, and for only the most qualified applicants to be granted admission to the universities they apply to regardless of gender; however, that is unlikely to happen in a world obsessed with trying to deny women the chance to make up lost ground. College admissions boards should not give men any sort of advantage in the admissions process, as doing so will deny women the right to catch up to this male-dominated society.</p>

<p>tl;dr sry 10char</p>

<p>

You need to explain this more. You’re condemning affirmative action pretty hastily. Diversity matters in a learning environment</p>

<p>

You make it sound like the colleges are choosing 4.0 females over 3.2 males. Many places have more qualified men & women than they know what to do with. You’re making a huge generalization. Males are not that few in number that colleges have to lower their standards.</p>

<p>

Wow. Source?</p>

<p>

This is basically an affirmative action argument (correct past injustices) but you just said that only academics matter.</p>

<p>

Wow. This sounds really bitter and borderline misandrist. The world is <em>obsessed</em> with denying women opportunities? Male-dominated society? This isn’t objective at all</p>

<p>The only unfair aspect of this situation is that you somehow have internet access…</p>

<p>wow, a bit biased perhaps?
I see your point, it’s just expressed in language that distorts the situation. I’m sure universities aren’t taking hugely underqualified males over qualified females. </p>

<p>But as you know, life is not fair anyways. You could say that because I’m asian, good grades won’t help me, and that’s unfair. I didn’t choose to be born asian, and yet I’m receiving consequences. But that’s how it is anyways. Similar case here. As long as it’s not hugely unfair, it is acceptable.</p>

<p>i think u should rethink ur thesis… MIT rejected more boys this year for girls… underqualified girls… so did many of the ivies… get ur facts straight…</p>

<p>boys are being underminded now… cuz of equality… whenr eally its not equal anymore… girls have an unfair advantage now in engineering schools like MIT/Caltech and it ****s it up for the guys who really tried hard to stand out and they didnt get picked cuz some girl who wasnt up to par with them but was part of the female generation of intellectual got in…</p>

<p>It depends on the school. There are a number of schools where females have an advantage. It’s usually an advantage to apply places where you stand out, and where more of your kind is wanted. No news there.</p>

<p>holy biased batman</p>

<p>Meg,</p>

<p>There was a story in U.S. News and World Report about a year ago about colleges and whether or not they are biased in their admissions practices. I would seriously look at that piece. It was quite well done. It was also fairly balanced.</p>

<p>As a teacher, I can tell you that I’ve seen both sides of this. At some schools, where females tend to be in the minority, some of my female students gained admission over my male students who had higher scores and good grades. In other case, I’ve seen the opposite. There was a male who got into one of the highly selective schools whose scores and GPA are no where as good as last year’s valedictorian, who was a female. </p>

<p>Guess what? That valedictorian was so glad that she did not receive admission. The school she attends offers her far more opportunities than she could have ever imagined. </p>

<p>Do some research on this subject. Contact some admissions people, not just at your school but others.</p>

<p>^i’ve read the US news article. </p>

<p>and this isn’t true for some techy places aka MIT :D</p>

<p>You say that the curiculum changes have not negatively affected boys. You might want to back up that assumption, as I, and possibly your professor, have heard evidence to the contrary. You even include some of this evidence.</p>

<p>Also, some colleges give preferences to boys because after the ratio of boys to girls reaches 40-60 or below, applications from both genders drop precipitously. How would you deal with that? There are a lot of practical concerns about having a male-female imbalance - would females not be able to get on-campus housing?</p>

<p>Also, how would adress the argument some people make that this is just akin to what was done some time ago for women and is still done for those who apply to engineering schools?</p>

<p>You are quick to dismiss racial affirmative action, and yet you imply that the previous affirmative action towards women should be reinstated; you also say that admissions should not be based regard to gender, but you say that women should be given advantages, which is directly contrary to earlier statements that imply that giving any group an advantage is wrong. How would you reconcile these?</p>

<p>If you adress these possible counterarguments, your paper might become a lot better. Also, cut down on the ranting. Just be careful not to lose your focus.</p>

<p>Girls do not have an advantage in admissions at Caltech. The reason their acceptance rate is higher is that they tend to be more focused and serious about science than many boys who apply, a lot of whom were pressured into applying by their parents.</p>

<p>I laughed for a while.</p>

<p>“A few years ago, Elon University in North Carolina started a small engineering program and moved its football team to NCAA division I to attract more male applicants; Greg L. Zaiser, Elon’s dean of admissions, also says that they created a more strict deadline for applications to motivate the normally less-conscientious male applicants to be more on top of the admissions process. Some colleges have even changed the palettes of their brochures from pastel to primary, in an attempt to make their schools look more appealing to boys. But these marketing campaigns alone are not enough for colleges to get the male ratios they need; they must also “quietly tweak their standards to give male applicants a leg up” in the admissions process, according to editorialist Robin Wilson.”</p>

<p>seriously? sources?</p>

<p>I’m all for giving women their equal opportunities, but to state the obvious here, feminist outburst much? i’m sorry if you’ve had to face male adversity in your career. some guys are d*cks. this doesn’t mean all colleges are out to get you. or… not… get you.</p>

<p>The original post is more than two years old!</p>

<p>Sticky territory, but I want to advise something first:</p>

<p>To prevent bias, don’t have a hypothesis first. “I decided to write a paper focusing on the way college admissions boards often pass over girls for boys in an attempt to even out the gender ratios of their schools.”</p>

<p>If you come into this essay thinking like that, no matter what, you will always lean in that direction. You need to figure out first if there is the same bias for girls in the first place, because otherwise your argument is going to eat you like a pack of piranhas.</p>

<ul>
<li>Edit: Geezus, CC needs to have color coded topic titles. Sometimes I don’t always look to see if the date is old…</li>
</ul>

<p>For some reason boys suffer from a much higher rate of ADHD than girls do which means that girls have far fewer academic and disciplinary problems in high school so in terms of high school performance many more girls than boys have good high school records that get them into college while boys often do not. Boys actually outperform girls on the SATs, particularly in math, but SAT scores usually take a back seat in college admissions to high school transcripts. </p>

<p>The increase in the number of girls in colleges and universities has been accompanied by an increase in students majoring in subjects such as Psychology, Communications, Political Science and other social sciences. Despite attempts to recruit more girls into the physical sciences and engineering, schools like MIT and Caltech still are still predominantely male. This is not hard to understand when one looks at the statistics showing a much larger number of boys who score 700 or higher on the Math section of the SATs than girls.</p>

<p>I think the gender differences seen in colleges and universities are largely a combination of the biological differences between boys and girls and the type and number of majors being offered by colleges and universities.</p>