<p>Do you think it’s better to have 1 or 2 scores that are radically higher than the rest
IE (25M 28r 27s 36E)
or have scores that are all generally even
(29m 30r 29s 31E</p>
<p>i think the latter looks better. looks like you have a solid education in all the major subjects, rather than A CRAZY GOOD english teacher and a math teacher who sleeps in class.</p>
<p>thats just my opinion :D</p>
<p>How about in terms of improvement</p>
<p>wellll if you have time to improve and stuff i guess the first one would be better. you missed more in more sections, rather than having to improve by just one question in just one section or something.</p>
<p>LOL STORY OF MY LIFE :(</p>
<p>In terms of improvement I think the first one is better because you have lots of room for increase in three of your scores while the second one might show that you have leveled out your scores and a sufficient increase in your composite score would have to involve improving all your scores which may not be possible</p>
<p>If this is your senior year there’s no time to improve anything.
If this is your junior year there’s plenty of time for improvement in any of the scores.
Unlike SAT, ACT doesn’t send your previous scores.
If you have to choose which one to send, I would send the one with the highest composite score.</p>