<p>It is with much amusement that I read in my local newspaper of the latest “crackdown on drug abuse” in my townish city. But then, why should I see it as fighting windmills? And by seeing it as fighting windmills, don’t I make it stay that way?</p>
<p>When I first came to an American high school from Singapore secondary school I was kind of shocked that the passing of cigarettes, alcohol and sometimes weed was so open between students. I remember the first time it happened at the back of the bus I was wondering why the other kids acted like it was normal, and I was waiting for someone to speak up or complain, but no one did. And of course being the newcomer I didn’t want to ostracise myself committing a faux pas right on the spot, so silent I remained. It is a thing that everyone gets “used to” because the more I saw it happened, the less shocked I became each time. You must forgive my naivete, for even in the Singaporean version of the inner city schools, though you might get gang violence and a suffocating anti-intellectual culture among students, narcotics use was always hush-hush. No one boasted about it. </p>
<p>I suspect that part of it is that gang assault could get you something like 3 to 5 years, while you could be executed for having more than 250 grams of weed, and more than 15 grams of heroin. This probably means some kids you know would probably have ended up with nooses over their heads had they been caught in Singapore. Hence, flagrant displays of gang signs in school, but never drugs.</p>
<p>So I wonder, as parents – would you choose to end the drug problems in your schools or even cities by executing kids? That’s the only reasonably effective “crackdown” I envision.</p>
<p>But the other thing is that that even with the whole anonymous tip hotline, no one likes to rat on friends, even acquaintances. Why would I choose to rat on my Art classmate, who makes pretty good art though he talks about his drug escapades over the weekend? Even if the police department says that they’ll treat drug addicts in the most humane way possible and often they’re just looking for someone to help them out? In America, we’re more individualist I suppose, so we think, “it’s their life…” and plus, it seems to work pretty well too. I mean, except for a few druggies who I absolutely loathe (more because they’re occultists and Satanists and are extremely hostile), when you see those who talk about or even flash their wares at school, you think, “Meh. Nothing disastrous is going on.” The shock of seeing the facebook photos of the valedictorian at a drinking party wears off after a while. No one rats on her. It is the peer mantra of “I respect your life if you respect mine.” So ratting is taboo.</p>
<p>But at some point, the line is crossed, such as when it moves beyond weed to cocaine. Harder drugs are much rarer at my school and I only knew it was a problem through the student judicial court. And at school I suppose, we may think they’re doing fine, not knowing just how horrible are blackouts and ODs they have over the weekend. And at some point the line gets crossed when the consequence for a “freshman tattler” (who saw several students sniffing coke in the bathroom) moves beyond ridicule and ostracism to violent intimidation. It’s a risky strategy for the threatener – fear of speaking against the majority usually works most of the time, but threatening the student means you dissolve all previous discouraging factors in favour of violence. That is when most students would be compelled to rat. But what about other cases?</p>
<p>It’s very telling to see how fellow peers refer to it. “It happens at my school.” </p>
<p>“It happens.” Some mysterious force put it there.</p>