Dodgeball is a tool of ‘oppression’ used to ‘dehumanize’ others, researchers argue

Interesting read on Dodgeball which I tend to agree with but always enjoyed playing.

One of gym classes’ most common games is being used as a tool of “oppression,” according to a team of Canadian researchers. Dodgeball in phys-ed classes teaches students to dehumanize and harm their peers, professors from three Canadian universities said in a presentation this week at the Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Vancouver. A paper on the subject is set to appear in the journal European Physical Education Review.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/06/07/dodgeball-is-tool-oppression-used-dehumanize-others-researchers-argue/?utm_term=.e4e3d016666d

OMG!

I was the kid with glasses, the naturally non-athletic girl who was always picked last for sports in gym class and even I think this is ridiculous. Dodgeball as a tool of oppression? Will this politically correct snowflake world never cease finding things to be upset about? It’s just a game! Why don’t we outlaw Scrabble because it upsets dyslexics (like my H and 2 of my beloved sons)? Why don’t we outlaw Jeopardy because not everyone is smart and charismatic enough to get on the show? Let’s outlaw professional sports because not everyone is good enough to be in the big leagues? Or cancel Broadway and the ballet because reminding people that they can’t sing or have two left feet is oppressive?

I stank at dodgeball and every other sport ever invented, but I never considered myself oppressed by having to play them in gym class.

To these oppressed researchers, I say - get over it and get behind that ball.

This was on the front page of our paper today.

Dodge ball of today in NOT the dodge ball of my youth. We formed a circle and put a monkey in the middle and people took aim. Getting hit hurt! Now, there are a bunch of nerf balls or soft rubber balls and you run up to a line, grab a ball, and try to get someone out on the other side. If you don’t want to get hit, don’t pick up a ball, just stay in the back. If you don’t want to stay in the game, get hit right away and go sit down.

My kids loved it. They’d go over to the health club once a week or so and join in a game with kids ranging from 5-18. The older kids helped the younger ones (and then tried to kill each other).

I guess it will all come out in therapy that I forced them to go to dodge ball and be pummeled by balls.

The comments on that article are really interesting. There are many many posts by people who were targeted and bullied by bigger and more aggressive kids who threw the ball at students’ heads as hard as they could, causing bruises, welts, bent glasses, etc. People mention gym teachers egging on the bullies, even mocking those who complained about getting smashed in the face (which was supposed to be against the rules). And every post by someone who absolutely hated dodgeball, who reported being physically hurt or feeling humiliated and angry, is countered by a handful of jerks mocking them for being wimps, wussies, snowflakes, nerds, pansies, etc. So basically the same dynamic as middle school dodgeball. I guess some people just never grow up.

Arguments that hockey and football are more violent, or that other activities (Scrabble, Jeopardy, ballet, whatever) can also make people feel inadequate, totally miss the point — those activities are all voluntary. No one is forced to join the football team or play Scrabble or go on Jeopardy if they don’t want to. The issue addressed in the article is that dodgeball is (or was) a mandatory PE activity in which kids who do not want to participate, kids who KNOW they are going to be targeted and physically hurt, cannot opt out. And I totally agree with the article to the extent that dodgeball should not be a mandatory activity, and I agree with the recommendation for school PE classes to focus more on general health and fitness and less on sports.

But I think the authors also invite a certain amount of ridicule for framing the issue as political oppression. This comment sums up my feelings exactly:

“Why don’t we outlaw Scrabble because it upsets dyslexics (like my H and 2 of my beloved sons)? Why don’t we outlaw Jeopardy because not everyone is smart and charismatic enough to get on the show? Let’s outlaw professional sports because not everyone is good enough to be in the big leagues? Or cancel Broadway and the ballet because reminding people that they can’t sing or have two left feet is oppressive?”

Sigh. Because those things may make you feel bad because you’re not good at them. We all have to learn to accept that there are things that we are not as good at as others.

Dodgeball makes you feel bad because the entire point is to allow others to hurt you and often results in at least minor physical harm. We should never have to accept that.

If you truly don’t understand the difference I think that’s troubling.

Good lord, it’s a game. Suck it up.

No one should ever tell anyone to “ suck up” an involuntary activity where the entire point is for other to physically target them. Dodgeball is a terrible “ game” that shoukd never be permitted as part of mandatory PE. Anyone who wants to play. Have at it. Join a league. Whatever. Just don’t force others to be involved in something where someone gets to hurt them for fun.

I guess some of the favorite games we played as kids in the 80s like ”muckle” and “Bombardment” would be considered much worse.

First game has no object , just give one kid the ball and everyone tries to tackle them. Then another and another. It was the default game to play.

And the other is a game similar to dodgeball but one ball and everyone running around the gym trying not to get hit and grab the ball to throw at someone. Last one standing wins.

So dodgeball teaches all of these bad things but multi player Call of Duty video games played by millions of kids artificially trying to kill each other is better. Sitting on their butts.

Not really keeping the pioneer spirit with this generation it seems.

Some kids are good at dodgeball. Some are good in Algebra. It all works out.

I wish smart researchers like this would use that talent in more meaningful ways. Perhaps a study on how those taking all the cashews out of the mixed nuts makes others feel invalidated.

Kids who are good at Algebra don’t get to smack the less math-adept kids in the face with their textbooks. And as much as I am not a fan of Call of Duty, no one is forced to play and no one gets physically hurt in real life.

Leaning to duck is helpful tool in the real world. I’m sure if the child doesn’t want to play a note would suffice.

A lot of people feel humiliated and are harmed by a mandatory activity which has nothing to do with education. Seems logical to stop that activity, instead of mocking people as snowflakes.

Here are some examples of people’s experiences being bullied and targeted while being forced to play this “game” in PE. I find people’s willingness to dismiss these accounts as the complaints of wimpy snowflakes who just need to “suck it up” rather disturbing.

"I recall dodgeball being a very Lord-of-the-Flies affair in which some of the most physically aggressive kids in class would gang up on the weaker ones and pummel them with the ball with terrifying ferocity. In my school, those hit did not then get to become throwers. They just got to leave the game (mercifully). I used to get big red welts where the throwers would hit me with the ball as hard as they possibly could. "

“I absolutely hated dodge ball. It was the 70s and I was the ungainly, fat, and nerdy girl who got good grades. I was absolutely bombarded with balls the second the game started. Eventually I would just throw myself in front of the first ball so I could leave the game and read my book in the stands. I’m pretty sure that the purpose of the game was not to cause the fat kids to spend the P. E. time in the stands, but there was a regular cohort of us trying to avoid being battered and bruised. The game, in my opinion, is useless to encourage activity in children but is really quite good at encouraging violence.”

“When I was a child in elementary school, the “rule” was that the ball must be aimed toward the legs only. Players who wanted to harm classmates they didn’t like often decided that this rule did not apply to them. I know, because I was frequently the victim of this kind of bullying. I’d often been hit - hard - in the stomach and on the face. If I complained to the P.E. coach, it was brushed off as “accidental”. If I cried when I was injured, I was labeled a “baby” by classmates who sucked up to bullies in order to avoid being their next victim.”

“The gym coaches I had would pick the teams…usually one team would be “football player” type students vs. the “chess club” type students. It was all part of the coaches teaching athletic students to be “Jocks”. We even had some of the “victim team” kids knocked out with concussions.”

“I recall the bigger, stronger kids who had a penchant for bullying targeting those they disliked who were usually much smaller in stature. Roars of laughter led by the gym instructor would erupt if these rubbery missiles hit their target, a face shot at high velocity that rang throughout the gym. Looking back, I wonder how this is even possible in a civil society? How this activity was created and condoned by adults?”

“I am usually skeptical of studies like this, but there is no doubt that sadism is a major part of dodgeball. I even remember that back in elementary school, the gym teacher played as well, and this full grown man loved throwing the ball at us kids as hard as he could.”

“Dodgeball in school was really the bigger, athletic kids sadistically eliminating the smaller, spastic kids . . . . then getting down to real business on each other. You can guess which group has fond memories of dodgeball in school.”

“I knew plenty of kids who absolutely dreaded dodgeball. It gave some of the nastier kids in our school the opportunity to take out their aggressions on others without getting in trouble.”

“Fun?! Nope, although the athletically inclined, more aggressive and sadistic players certainly seemed to have a good time. Great “game” for bullies and those who aspire to same… Horrendous”

“They STILL play this in schools? We played this in gym in elementary school in the 70’s and kids would always get welts when the biggest kids in the class waled them with the ball.”

“I was never good at throwing balls and was not a jock, so I was a weak player, since I wore glasses it was common to have them flattened and bent against my face…”

“Dodgeball was the favorite game of the mean kids. Boy, did those balls sting. The rest of us attempted to hang back (out of range). Then they would go after the kids hanging back. . .”

“Heck yes it was dehumanizing. It sucked for anyone in that F’n gym class. All the jock A-holes teeing up on everyone else? Gym teachers reliving their sadistic tendencies in public. What a bunch of BS.”

“Sport?? Licensed assault”

“Dodgeball is fun if you are big or strong or aggressive. If you are none of these things, it is a nightmare. It is also a lazy gym teacher’s way to “plan” a lesson. Unless you volunteer to play on a team on your own time, no one should be forced to play a game that encourages students to use brute strength to deliberately target another student. Best outcome for many students? They get pounded by the ball and sit out the rest of the game. Great physical education there, coach. I work in the schools and can tell you that dodgeball should be outlawed in schools.”

I hated dodgeball as a kid. Got hit in the face and my braces bloodied my mouth and my glasses broke.

My D’d Dodgeball was played with soft nerf balls with zero intent to harm.

Are schools really still using those hard red balls or are we as adults projecting our experiences from the 70s onto today?

Dodgeball of today certainly can be a lot easier than the game in our day, …or not. At a lot of schools, too many schools, it’s still a cruel game. It isn’t permitted at my son’s School which is inner city , worst neighborhood school that literally has an asphalt jungle playground. It gives rise to to much easy opportunity to target certain kids.

There were some cruel games back in the day, but Dodgeball allows particularly cruel targeting. Anyone remember “Smear the Queer”?

When I first started teaching in public school more than 20 years ago, Dodgeball was not allowed. I’m surprised this is even a discussion in today’s day and age. I didn’t think anyone played this game any longer.

I remember playing Dodgeball as a kid and I wasn’t good at it. I learned to “dodge” the ball, occasionally catch it, and sometimes sit out because I didn’t want to play. Did you know if you just slide to the bleacher acting like you got out the gym teacher doesn’t notice? I wasn’t damaged by Dodgeball and probably learned a few life skills not to mention a couple of physical ones too. I especially remember laughing at myself with regard to how bad I was at the game.

I LOVED dodgeball as a kid. I just thought it was fun. I was never good at it, and I had braces. Maybe some kids hated it. I absolutely HATED being forced to do swimming first period at my high school in So Cal. The water was cold in the morning, it was embarrassing for guys to see us in swimsuits, you didn’t want anyone looking at you in the gym, etc… I also hated volleyball, track, and most other sports I was forced to play in gym. But dodgeball was fun and exciting.

Bullies are going to find a way to bully. I don’t recall any kids being hurt, and obviously if someone is intentionally trying to hurt someone, that’s wrong. But a bully can intentionally hurt someone in all kids of ways. They don’t need a ball to do it. Personally, I think this is a ridiculous story.

Let me start by saying I’m not a dodgeball victim, and I don’t know anyone who has ever said they were.

That said, I can’t imagine someone putting research money that could go to different things onto this particular issue.

We’ve known for ages that dodgeball allows some kids to target others while other games, say softball or volleyball, do not.

There’s no advantage to dodgeball over other games.

So why is it still being played in gym class? Why does it take a research study to tell gym teachers that this game is hurting kids while providing no benefit they can’t get elsewhere?

Now can we please use that research money to help us solve some issues that common sense can’t? Could we find a cure for cancer or the common cold? Could we work on teen anxiety and suicide rates? Can we find a way to eradicate hunger? To cut down on domestic violence? SO MANY issues need that research money, I can’t imagine why this particular study got it.

Yes, bullies will bully regardless, when and if an opportunity presents itself or even invent one. But why hand them opportunities under the guise of a game when it’s clear that it can be s predator’s delight?

Dodgeball can be a fun game, using soft equipment and supervision. With hard balls on a hard surface at schools where supervision is sketchy, it’s asking for trouble.

Volleyballs are hard. Hurts to get smacked with one. A kid can trip another kid deliberately during track. A kid could “accidentally” push someone into the swimming pool, could “accidentally” throw the bat, could ‘accidentally’ throw the softball, could “accidentally” kick that bouncy kickball, or worse, that hard soccer ball, into another kid.

The issue is bullying, not dodgeball. That is something worth spending money on, not the waste of time and money that this report is.

Gym as we all knew it no longer exists. You lost me when someone used the words “ terrifying ferocity” to describe a game with an inflatable rubber ball.