<p>When you think about it, all the companies in the private space industries only exist either thanks to government contracts or because some super wealthy people are interested in space. The only immediate commercial value of all this effort is selling flights into LEO or stays in inflatable space hotels for around a million a pop. There needs to be the potential for huge money-making in any infant industry in order for it to flourish; this leads me to believe that space exploration doesn’t have much of a future – at least in the next couple decades.</p>
<p>But then there are articles like [Entrepreneurs</a> Enter the Commercial Space Race - NYTimes.com](<a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/08/science/space/08space.html?pagewanted=1]Entrepreneurs”>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/08/science/space/08space.html?pagewanted=1) and [Four</a> Companies to Watch in the Brave New Commercial Space Mission Era | Fast Company](<a href=“http://www.fastcompany.com/1657805/spacex-bigelow-private-company-space-nasa-obama-cots-rockets-science-human-spaceflight]Four”>http://www.fastcompany.com/1657805/spacex-bigelow-private-company-space-nasa-obama-cots-rockets-science-human-spaceflight) that talk about the bright future of these private space companies, which makes me a bit confused. IMO, NASA alone isn’t a reliable market at all; its budget fluctuates at the whim of public opinion. What do you think?</p>