<p>I just took a practice test and it was really difficult. I got a raw score of 20 which according to the 2011-2012 conversion table provided here: [2011-12</a> SAT Practice Test Score Conversion Tables | SAT Tutor’s Blog](<a href=“http://www.sat-tutors-blog.com/2011/09/15/2011-12-sat-practice-test-score-conversion-tables/]2011-12”>http://www.sat-tutors-blog.com/2011/09/15/2011-12-sat-practice-test-score-conversion-tables/) - I got a scaled score of 460, which is horrible. The highest that I’ve gotten using the PR book and BB was a raw score of 40 or 630 scaled. So, to put it in in perspective that’s a 170 pt decrease and I’m really disappointed. Should I expect this at the beginning or should I just move on and use different books?</p>
<p>Toss the Chung junk in the bin. And ignore.</p>
<p>Dr. Chung’s is really difficult because it is meant for those scoring in the high 600s to low 700s. If I remember correctly, unlike other study guides, its problems are all hard level ones so if you don’t have a strong background in math already, try easier books such as Barron’s or the Blue book first and then come back to Dr. Chung’s. Review the tips extensively (I did, and it helped!). Try making flashcards and look over them before and after a test. Make corrections on anything you got wrong. I hope that helps you a bit and good luck! :)</p>
<p>Not really!</p>
<p>If finding harder problems would be relevant, all one should do is look at GMAT or GRE books. Chung’s book is just an extremely poor and confused attempt.</p>