<p>I hate how people just apply to schools for the sake of applying. There are a whole bunch of academically strong students who applied to GWU with no intention of matriculating. I hope that GWU deciphers between those who truly want to attend GW and those who don’t.</p>
<p>Well, too late for that. I couldn’t apply ED, because my parents wouldn’t make that nearly $60K/year commitment. All I know is that if I get accepted, I’m going to do everything I can so I can attend GWU. GWAlum07, mind if I PM you with some questions?</p>
<p>it depends. if they feel like people arent really interested in the school then they wont accept them . really, the why GW needs to be really strong. that could make or break an application.</p>
<p>Overqualified means that the 25% who have sat scores of 2100+ had a relatively easier chance of being accepted. The qualified is the 50% that had a decent chance of being accepted. But even given the relative ease, that 25% had demonstrated that GW is really a school that they would want to attend instead of treating it as a safety school. Those who do treat it as a safety school are the ones who’ll get rejected, no matter how high their scores are. as adababy said, the why gw essay is important, especially to those who are overqualified and underqualified. </p>
<p>On a side note, the ED acceptances are crazy this year! I feel like gw really is trying to protect its yield by doing this. I don’t think it’s going to be VERY tough this year though, maybe just slightly. And yeah i’m betting mid 5000s on this one too.</p>
<p>Well my hopes of getting accepted here have now decreased. I really hope I have showed enough interest in my essay…
I would love to attend this school.</p>
<p>I was really surprised to see that GWU offers an ED option in January on the same date as the RD deadline! It seems to me to discriminate against kids who need financial aid in order to make a decision.</p>
<p>^
You can always turn down an offer of admissions through ED if you feel that the financial aid offered is not sufficient so I don’t think it is discriminatory in that sense… :p</p>