English Question: Theorem....

<p>It was something along the lines of:</p>

<p>UNKNOWN NAME even created a theory that was named after her</p>

<p>Should you add (UNKOWN LAST NAME’s theorem) after “her”?</p>

<p>And it was either </p>

<p>a. Yes, this adds relevant information
b. No, this is redundant</p>

<p>Its not redundant is it? Not necessarily right? Just because its named after her doesn’t mean that it is ‘last name’ theorem… right?</p>

<p>What did you guys put/ what do you think?</p>

<p>I put no, it is redundant.</p>

<p>I had trouble with this one for some reason but after some debate I put down that it would be redundant.</p>

<p>redundant also. following rules or not it did not sound right in the sentence</p>

<p>Definitely redundant.</p>

<p>Redundancyxdgfsdg.</p>

<p>It was redundantly redundant</p>