<p>Class of '11 - you hold the distinction of being the last applicants to use the Un-common Application. Despite a large backlash from students, the administration has decided to switch to the common app for next year.</p>
<p>Oh wow…see there was someone else who JUST posted something two days ago saying Chicago was becoming a prestige whore and would switch to the common app soon anyways. That’s messed up.</p>
<p>It’s sad. Anyone know if the uncommon app will be an option? Or will they only accept the common app? Personally, I find the common app to be more annoying. A bunch of the basic info has to be filled out twice anyway- once on the regular part and once on each supplement. And with lengthy supplements, each application still takes a lot of time. Also, I think some parts are dumb- why make us put in our scores if we’re sending transcripts and score reports anyway?</p>
<p>well i suppose they’ll prob make the supplement all unique and all. so it really isn’t all that bad. after all, what characterizes the uncommon app is th eessays.</p>
<p>The classic argument, “Oh, well, as long as we keep the essays, yeah, it, yeah…” Fat chance.</p>
<p>"
O’Neill said that — when the shift takes place, probably in the fall of 2008 — one of the short essays would have to be dropped. He said it would probably be the “favorites” essay.
"</p>
<p>Have fun writing “In 200 words or less, which activity would you continue to do and why. Do not exceed the character limit, or you will be cut off.”</p>
<p>I’m certainly no fan of the move, but before everyone jumps off the cliff, ask yourself what the actual differences in content there were between the Common and UnCommon. Certainly the essays were uncommon, but I would expect the most important part, the outlandish main essays, to stay. And just because the Director once said something doesn’t mean it will necessarily happen that way. The big thing to me is that if you still want to write a “favorite” essay, you can and they will read it. I liked the Uncommon too, but what are we really losing here, other than disincentives for the less interested to apply?</p>
<p>One can make the case that having more people apply is bad, but the thing is that having a different, less self-selected group apply doesn’t necessarily translate into a different group getting admitted and choosing to attend. This is where the admissions office has to step up to the plate and continue selecting well-qualified applicants who WANT to be at UChicago, not just those who want a backup for HYP.</p>
<ol>
<li>if you switch to common app and more people appy, how does that make your ranking go up?</li>
<li>currently, it is ranked 9, it is in the top 10 schools in the country, how much higher does it want to go. like, what is all this fuss about making it go up in ratings, its not like its ranked low, its very high in fact, does it want to beat HYMPS? cuz thats just not happening</li>
</ol>
<p>Why don’t they accept both? It can’t be too complicated to use both the common and uncommon apps, since several other schools do this. It would increase applicants but satisfy those who love the uncommon app. IMO, it would still stink that they were using the CA, but it seems like a good compromise.</p>