<p>Please remove all spaces between “im” and “gur” in order to see the images</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/Y2b4CLe.png
Answer: A</p>
<p>Why can’t it be E?</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/6Ymaoj8.png
Answer: B</p>
<p>What is the error in B?</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/iP4wbbS.png
Question 11: D</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/cKeS8Wl.png
Answer: A</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/JIUx0Qj.png
Answer: D</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/VJqiA29.png
Answer: 195</p>
<p><a href=“http://i.im”>http://i.im</a> gur.com/koVnp5d.png
Answer: 1/6</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<ol>
<li><p>It can’t be E because “possibly with similar reasons” can’t be followed by “that.” “Similar that” isn’t a coherent phrase. It could say “possibly for reasons similar to” or something like that.</p></li>
<li><p>B should be “with regard to” or “regarding” or “in regard to”; “in regards to” isn’t a phrase but you can use “as regards” to introduce a topic- see <a href=“‘In Regard To’ Versus ‘In Regards To’ - Quick and Dirty Tips”>http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/regard-versus-regards</a></p></li>
<li><p>You know that the call took less than 2 hours because it ended before 8 AM Monday and stayed within the same 60% of price period- so the call ends before 8 PM Tuesday and stays within the same price period (35% off this time). Just take the $3.60 for Monday, divide by .4 (since 100% - 60% = 40%) to get the regular price ($9) and then multiply that price with .65 (100% - 35% = 65%) to get $5.85, so it’s D.</p></li>
<li><p>You can get b just because the value is 24 at the bottom of the ledge and these rectangles (as everything meets at a right angle, so they’re not shrinking) have the same lengths on those shared sides. You can get c the same way (the rectangle’s two sides, 5 units long, match up). You can get d the same way, too… 12. And e is 4- same method. For a, you could try doing the same- except you can’t add everything up since the lowermost edge doesn’t have a width unit in that area. You could try the Pythagorean theorem, so there’s only one side. So by process of elimination and the lack of a visible solution, it’s A.</p></li>
<li><p>The three sides of an equiangular triangle have the same length (because same angles and all), so PQ = QR = PR = 6. Since the small triangle is 7 + sqrt(13) in perimeter, and since the sqrt(13) side is the one given to you, you know that the other two sum up to 7. Since the perimeter of the triangle as a whole would’ve been 6 * 3 = 18, just subtract 7 to get the perimeter of the quadrilateral minus the little line in the middle (since that line in the middle wasn’t part of the original triangle). Add that back to the 11 (18 - 7) and you get 11 + sqrt(13). Hence D.</p></li>
<li><p>Obviously if Ken has as many 3’s as possible (since they individually have lower value), he has the most tokens he can have. So you’re looking for how many tokens Ken can have if as many of them as possible are 3’s. 585 is just coincidentally perfectly divisible by 3 (you can test it this way- add up the digits 5 + 8 + 5 = 18; if the digits’ sum is divisible by 3, the number is divisible by 3). 585/3 = 195.</p></li>
<li><p>If PS = 10, then PQ = 5 (and so does QS). So draw a line at QR (which is equal to the radius and thus equal to 5). Now you have a triangle with three sides- QR, PQ, and PS… all of them 5 units in length. Remember that rule about equilateral triangles? They’re also equiangular (well, last time you began with an equiangular triangle; this time it’s with an equilateral one- but they’re the same thing and I’m digressing). And 180/3 = 60 degrees (equilateral/equiangular triangles always have 60 degree angles). You know that the circle has 360 degrees total, and 60 degrees of that is 1/6 of the circle’s degrees. The length of an arc as a portion of the circumference is the same ratio as the angle of the arc and the angle of the circle (360 degrees), so that’s 1/6 as well.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Feel free to ask further questions- I might not have explained all of these thoroughly.</p>
<p>^Thank you for the reply</p>
<p>but regarding your explanation for Question 1, the sentence would then read “and even fish also yawn, possibly with similar reasons that mammals do”. That sounds coherent to me.</p>
<p>Regarding your explanation for Question 3, I don’t understand what Monday has to do with the situation.</p>
<p>For Question 4, the 5 is the value for the little edge on the very top, not for c. So therefore, I still don’t understand how you would be able to get c.</p>
<p>For Question 7, I am totally lost in your explanation. You said make a triangle with lines at QR, PQ, and PS but that does not make a triangle. And you say that PS is 5 when PS is in fact 10. </p>
<p>No problem.</p>
<p>“Similar reasons” is talking about reasons that are similar to some other object. There’s no object offered by the “mammals do” clause- what are the “reasons” similar to? And ofc it’s similar <em>to</em>, not similar <em>that</em>.</p>
<p>Look at the graph. There’s different discounts offered at different days/times. (10 and 11 are under the same graph)</p>
<p>You can get c by subtracting the (6 + 4) from the 20- notice that there are three vertical segments on the front of the stairs corresponding with the big 20 on the other side- and 2 of them (6 and 4) are given, so you know that c is 10.</p>
<p>Whoops. I messed up with Q and O. The triangle is POR (with PO, OR, and PR as its three sides). All of them are 5; sorry about misidentifying the sides.</p>
