Expressing interest in teaching in SOP

<p>I’m in the process of writing my SOP for PhD programs biomedical sciences (genetics, comp bio, or bioinformatics). My long-term goal is to become an undergraduate professor, hopefully at a smaller “teaching” type college or liberal arts college. I do enjoy research as well, but I know my calling is in teaching. </p>

<p>I’ve heard discussing my desire to teach may not be favorable for PhD admissions. I discussed this with one of my PI’s who mentioned that I may not want to go in depth about my desire to teach rather than to primarily do research. This idea confuses me because in order to become a professor, you must obtain your PhD. It’s a catch 22. I do want to mention my desire to teach because I have spent a lot of time and effort volunteering/working as a mentor and tutor for high school and undergrad students (primarily science and math tutoring and mentoring students interested in STEM careers). As of now I have 5+ years experience in mentoring/tutoring and 3+ years in research.</p>

<p>What are your thoughts??? Write about my interests in education in detail (in addition to discussing my research background) or simply mention it and move on to discussing my research background…</p>

<p>Not sure about the sciences, but I know that a background and desire to teach is encouraged in the History programs I am applying to.</p>

<p>So, it’s a delicate and rather political dance that you have to do around this subject. (This advice is targeted towards people in the sciences and social sciences.)</p>

<p>Most people want to get a PhD to become a professor. I, like you, want to teach at a liberal arts college. And the truth is, the vast majority of PhDs will not end up at an R1 - they’ll end up at a small state university, a liberal arts college, or a community college teaching 3 or 4 classes a year (perhaps more).</p>

<p>HOWEVER…the goal of a PhD (theoretically) is to do research. Moreover, if you are applying to very prestigious/competitive programs, they’re going to be focused on your research career with the expectation that you end up at an R1 or maybe a research institute or something - but the ultimate accomplishment is if they replicate themselves and put you at a Wisconsin-Madison or a Harvard or such. And if you’re perceived at the outset at being interested in teaching, you might turn them off - because they’re going to think you’re going to spend too much time investing in improving your teaching record and not enough time and interest on conducting research. I’m at a top R1 now and both of my advisors are “warning” me about spending too much time TAing and not enough time doing research, even though since ending up here I’ve expressed my interest in being a professor at an undergraduate liberal arts college and mentoring students at the undergrad level in research.</p>

<p>SO. Retain your dreams and goals and don’t let them (graduate school) change you. However, be selective about what you say. When you write your SOP, you can certainly say that you are interested in being a professor and teaching - but say it in the context of research AND teaching. And always emphasize the research more than the teaching. You want to give the illusion, so to speak, that you are focused on a long career as a researcher publishing in top journals and making your alma mater look good.</p>

<p>As an additional note…wanting to teach is an admirable thing, and you do need a PhD to do so, and you are far more likely to get a position as a professor with an interest in the biomedical sciences. However…I hope you are really passionate about research too, because that is what you are going to spend the VAST majority of your time doing in graduate school. You may TA one class a year, and they might not let you TA in your first year, and any more TAing or - God forbid - teaching a full class on your own may be frowned upon. I told my advisor I was thinking about being a lecturer for a full psychology class during this or next summer and he looked at me as if my eyeballs had just rolled out of my head. He told me straight up that he basically thought that was a waste of a graduate student’s time - and this is a professor that is always very supportive of my desires and goals. He doesn’t mind that I want to teach at a liberal arts college, but despite that he feels like I should be publishing and researching instead of teaching.</p>

<p>As another aside…mentioning your teaching aspirations IS really useful in fellowship applications. For my NSF application (which I got)I mentioned my experience mentoring students and my desire to be a role model and mentor for students, especially those from underrepresented groups, to go into science and research. The Ford really wants that kind of statement, too. So save it for the fellowship applications :)</p>

<p>Do this at your own peril. Teaching is viewed as the lowest possible way to spend time by faculty (second to maybe mentoring). They don’t want to hear about your passion for your field and your desire to share it with others. They really prefer to hear about how you like to spend time in lab pumping out data that is already formatted for their grant proposal submissions. Your SOP needn’t be a thing of beauty and you can define yourself in a document that doesn’t get evaluated by an admissions committee.</p>

<p>

Agreed, a thousand times.</p>

<p>Good advice. Your record will pretty much speak for itself to your interest and ability to teach. To some extent this will be favorable as you will likely have to TA and/or teach their undergrads a some point in your program. But places want to hire people who are known as good researchers (and good teachers too at LAC’s.) The whole point of a science PhD is to be an expert in research, so that’s what you talk about, I agree. Of course my daughter will hope to get placement at a good U, but she wants to do it to be a professional researcher. She likes teaching too and had some nice experience as an undergrad TA in a department where the TA’s are integral to the program. I don’t think she even mentioned it in her essay portion. Although it was in some fellowship applications.</p>

<p>Thank you all for the thoughtful advice! Don’t get me wrong, I do want to do research too but only in academia (I have little interest, as of now, in working for industry or for a national laboratory for more than a few years if at all). I’ve discussed this with each of my LOR writers (all of my previous research advisors/PIs), I’m sure they would use discretion in mentioning anything that may hurt my chances for admissions. They’ve all promised solid letters and are well aware of my academic, research, and extra-curricular background.</p>

<p>So I guess the general consensus is to emphasize your ability and motivation to do top quality research and only mention other facets of your life in the context of research???</p>