Exactly.
At a high level, the US has a public university system that, at least holding aside cost, largely resembles the university systems in other countries for admissions purposes, including relative predictability of which undergrad programs will admit you based on your basic academic qualifications. There are some complexities involving in-state versus out-of-state, but even then both of those channels tend to be largely predictable, with the exception of a very few OOS programs and even fewer in-state programs.
But then we ALSO have this system of private colleges and universities that is essentially unique in the world, and the most popular institutions in that private system (and a very few public programs that more or less act like those privates) practice the sort of holistic review that many high-numbers internationals complain about.
But then taking a step back, why are these high-numbers internationals so interested in these particular US colleges? Well, superficially, because they are the most “prestigious”, and also sometimes because if admitted, they have the most generous aid.
But if you really start thinking about that, those virtues depend in part on the very admission system these same people are complaining about.
To summarize a complex topic, these institutions are fabulously wealthy in a variety of ways, and they use that wealth to buy the most famous professors, provide swank dorms and other student services, provide the most generous aid, and so on. All that has made them very desired and prestigious.
But they didn’t get this wealthy by acting like a normal public institution. They got there by carefully cultivating repeat dealings with the socioeconomic elite families of the United States, and increasingly internationally. And that is still an ongoing process, they want to be in this same position in 50, 100, or 500 years, and so they are still carefully maintaining those relationships with elites.
And then they also admit a few really accomplished non-elite kids, which is nice for those non-elite kids. And these days that includes some non-elite international kids. But that is the exception and not the rule, because they need to keep admitting the elite kids to further their long-term institutional plans.
So, non-elite high-numbers internationals simultaneously desire to get admitted, WITH a very generous aid package, to one of these fabulously wealthy US institutions that have ongoing repeat relationships with the global socioeconomic elite, and yet complain about the admissions policies that are all part of how those US institutions created and maintain that sort of positioning in the first place.
And when it is pointed out there are US institutions that have the sorts of admissions policies they would prefer, well, they don’t want THOSE sorts of US admissions, those are no better than what they can already get in their own country.
Exactly.