<p>Alexandre, sometimes it can be difficult to choose between reports that seem to be at variance from each other – particularly from the same institution. In this case I’ll probably choose to go with your citation, and your long standing erudition, since it seems to be similar in percentages to a data sheet I have for a profile of students matriculating in 2010. I did notice that the 17% international figure has an asterisk noting that it included “US possessions,” but I don’t think that should increase the distribution differential all that much. So, I’m not sure how they arrived a that 17% international figure.</p>