<p>[sorry, I meant to include the following:]</p>
<p>This evaporating of Christianity as the dominant culture in the West can be seen as the natural course of a modern pluralistic democracy or it can be seen as the natural activism of the non-Christian disidents that are offended by such Christianity as is thickly woven into the public life of the American Republic, American identity and American way of life.</p>
<p>There are probably people, evangelicals, who would like to see America culture become or remain exclusively Judeo-Christian. What many people here refer to as a theocracy. And although I have never met this person, this theocrat, I suppose he exists somewhere in the crevices of middle-America. </p>
<p>Has anyone else here actually met a person, a theocrat, who holds such an exclusivist or dominion-ist view? They must be, by the look of things, an extreme minority, although they almost certainly must exist somewhere on down the line. Some would use the expression hiding under a rock.</p>
<p>I am not at all offended by the predominance of the Christian culture in America. </p>
<p>In India, you have a predominance of Hinduism; China, Atheism; Israel, Zionism-Judaism; Turkey, Islam etc. Each culture also has minority beliefs, whether traditional or secular. The traditional beliefs are the key to the culture of a people, the secular to the power of a people. In the modern world for either one to dominate the other, the people so dominated will become corrupted in both spirit and nature.</p>
<p>It is the reality of a nation, of a people deserving of the title a nation.
Some, in all countries, would prefer to change that reality as they are either 1) offended by the culture or 2) oppressed by the culture as they see it in their own lives. </p>
<p>From what I know of American history Americans as a people have forgiven themselves there faults by claiming that they were not American in origin but were, rather, religious in origin–it is the fault of their fathers in a peculiarly childish way, not themselves; Americans did not oppress black people, they were forced to because of their fathers traditions or religion–it cannot be that they are avaricious and mean all on their own (like most people in this world) , their fathers old religion just brainwashed them into acting poorly as human beings, etc, etc. It is not their fault or nature.</p>
<p>Transferring the problem to religion (a modern psychoanalytic trick), even Christian religion (the most modernist of all religions), is a diversion, a way of shifting the blame to something other than your own inferior feelings and actions. </p>
<p>The problem, people, is in your soul, not your religion. Although it may make you feel better about yourself to believe otherwise.</p>
<p>There is nothing to blame but yourself. Shed yourself of your culture and you will be culturally poor, whatever the culture; here, from representative democracy, to gospel & blues, to rock and Jazz, to modern medicine to computers, to consumerism to a libertarian spirit of freedom. </p>
<p>Instead shed yourself of your low self-esteem and hate. Religion is not a prior condition of hate. Only people themselves are; they are the necessary and sufficient condition of hate, anger and bitterness.</p>
<p>I read a lot of bitterness here. Maybe this is also part of the American culture.</p>