<p>
</p>
<p>But #1501 would still be #301 no matter when the other 300 declined their appointment, right? If those 300 declined on Jan 1, the next 300 would move up, leaving out #301 just as if those 300 declined on May 1st.</p>
<p>Your original post seemed to say that the sooner the “fence-sitters” declined it would be better for #1501, but I believe it may be better for #1501 (or #1550 or #1600) the later it gets. As the deadline approaches, many of those candidates #1201-#1500 may have given up and accepted civilian college offers while the dream-chasers would still be patiently waiting for the mailman. (Just an opinion, not a fact).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I disagree. The “fence-sitters” are not denying the dream-chasers anything. By their stats, achievement, and hard work, they have earned their early appointments, along with the right to ponder and reflect on their decision. I also find it hard to believe that any applicant would undertake the rigorous admissions process without having any intention on accepting it. That seems to be too much work for nothing.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, it is unfortunate for them, but preferring “more qualified” people is not just for the USNA, it could apply in almost any part of life. The “more qualified” will always be preferred in every situation, right? </p>
<p>How would you change it, or would you even want to?</p>