<p>From what the article says, it seems that the generation gap is between people 65 and older and those significantly younger, rather than between the young and middle-aged, as was the case in the 1960s.</p>
<p>And that actually rings true to me. If you divide everyone age 18 and over into three groups, I think you would find greater differences between the oldest group and the middle and youngest groups, rather than between the youngest group and the other two.</p>
<p>That seems logical. After all, the middle-aged group now were the youth of the 1960s and 1970s. Apparently they haven’t resolved their generation gap in the past three decades.</p>