Go for the scholarship or the dream school?

I am currently choosing between Mount Holyoke, Rice, and Wellesley.

Mount Holyoke has awarded me the Trustees Scholarship, which is full tuition for four years. As a result, it should cost about 16k to attend each year, or 64k for four years. I’ve been to Mount Holyoke three times, and really did not like it the first two times (one of those was the admitted students weekend). On my most recent trip, I liked it more, but still was not in love with the school. I was hoping to go to a school in a more metropolitan area that was larger, and had a bit more of the “name brand recognition factor” (I do recognize I need to get over this prestige thing). I am interested in studying political science, and possibly economics as a second major. One thing that I like about Mount Holyoke and the Trustee’s scholarship is that the alumnae network is strong, and the scholarship gives networking opportunities with the trustees of the schools. However, I am not sure of the strength of MHC’s alumnae network in comparison with Wellesley and Rice. Furthermore, I simply never “vibed” with the school, and am just not very excited about it at all.

Rice University was one of my top choice schools when I was applying to colleges, and when I visited over Owl Days, I completely fell in love with the school. I’m interesting in living outside of New England (I’m from MA), and I really liked Houston. I also feel like Houston would give me many internship and work opportunities during the school year that I would not be able to get at a rural school like MHC. I also love Rice’s campus, and every student I met at Rice I could easily see myself becoming friends with (something I did not feel at MHC). Rice also has managerial studies in their school of social sciences, which I could double major in with political science. Management is interesting to me, and I’d rather study managerial studies than econ, but Mount Holyoke and Wellesley do not offer this. In addition, the Baker Institute could provide me with more political internships and such. Basically Rice feels like a perfect fit for me, but costs about 50k a year.

Wellesley also costs about 50k a year. I appreciate Wellesley’s proximity to Boston, but that it still has a really liked the rural wild feeling campus. Wellesley’s political science professors have also graduated from top ranked political science graduate programs, and Wellesley has a very strong political network, and being a Seven Sister and all women’s college, the network is very strong and supportive of its graduates. I also like that Wellesley has lifelong career advising. Wellesley felt like a really good fit like Rice, but in a different way; where Rice felt like a place where I would grow socially and have the “best four years of my life”, Wellesley felt like it would be a great academic fit - students felt very focused in their studies, and the classes seemed to be challenging but not overwhelming (not that Rice did not feel like a good academic fit). I think that Wellesley may be able to take me the farthest career wise, and I like the pre-professional feel of the college (although Rice is a very strong name in Texas and overall has very good name recognition in the country as well).

If I were to go to MHC, I would not go into debt and I would have college funds left over that could be dedicated to graduate school, or wherever I end up going later in my life. If I go to Rice or Wellesley, they would eat up all of my college funds, my personal savings, and I’d have to take out some loans - around 30k over the four years most likely, although it could be a little more/less. I recognize that graduating debt free would allow me to go into graduate school directly from college if I don’t get enough scholarship money from grad school (especially since I’m considering a MBA right now, although I’ve only started thinking about graduate school recently since it’s never been an expectation for me to receive a graduate degree, and a lot could change over my four years of college), and I could get a low paying job in a political career without having to worry about paying back loans, whereas if I went to Rice/Wellesley, I’d have to take out loans on top of loans. However, I just don’t love MHC like I love Rice and Wellesley, and I wonder if Rice or Wellesley could take me farther career wise. But is Rice or Wellesley worth that 130k price difference? I’d love people’s opinions/personal experiences! I guess I’m having trouble putting this much money into perspective. Thanks!

My daughter’s school has a rule: if you don’t like a college you shouldn’t apply (or go) there. If you’re miserable, your grades (and probably your health and social life) will suffer. You’re probably not going to do well, which won’t help you in the long run to get internships etc. Four years is a long time to be at a place you don’t like. “Fit” is everything.

You could save some money (in travel) going to Wellesley, since your family is MA, but if you really love Rice, you should go there. Which is easy for me to say, since I don’t have to take on 130k of debt.

I believe poster said 30K over four years which I interpret to mean total, not each year…

Wow, Rice and MHC are such different schools - kind of hard to say. Are your parents ok with paying $50,000/year instead of $16,000? It seems like this is really a question for them and you to mull over seriously. It can mean a big difference to their lifestyle for the next few years or even beyond. Did you ask Rice or Wellesley if they would give you more money? It’s funny, when I was applying, Rice was such a good deal, one of the least expensive schools in the country. But that was a long time ago.

I don’t think undergraduate major is very important unless you’re going into a very technical field. The majority of students change their focus as they progress through school. With MHC, you get the advantage of the 5-college consortium. If you’re unhappy with the academic and/or social environment at MHC, you could work it so you’re spending a lot of time in Amherst either at UMass and/or at Amherst where you can pretty much find any class in the world you’d like to take and a variety of peers.

I’m inclined to say take the scholarship and use the 5-college consortium to your best advantage. You can really shine at MHC and make the most of it.

Good luck!

MHC is also a Seven Sister, FYI. It’s down to Wellesley, MoHo, Barnard, Bryn Mawr and Smith now, with Radcliffe eaten up by Harvard and Vassar coed.

@CADREAMIN @odannyboySF whoops I was mistaken. It would be more like 50k over four years (total).

@Earthmama68 my parents saved up money for my college tuition, so my college fund and my personal savings can be used for my college cost and then I have to cover the rest with loans. With MHC I’d come out with money leftover in my college fund that could be used for graduate school or whatever I end up doing after college. We appealed both Rice and Wellesley and played them off each other a bit which is why they’re both about 50k right now - they were higher before, yikes. I am leaning towards MHC right now because of the price. I do think I could be happy there; it just isn’t the college experience I was dreaming of.

@OHMomof2 whoops, didn’t mean to imply that it wasn’t. My fault for writing this so late at night and then not proofing it before posting this morning :slight_smile:

@flexiblegoose I think you’re being very smart about this. Good luck to you!!!