<p>I agree w/what M’s Mom is telling you.
Take a look at some of the private Midwestern LACs.
These schools will look at your application holistically; they should be less likely than a selective state university to get hung up on one number (your UW GPA).
Run their Net Price Calculators to see what your bottom line might be after aid.</p>
<p>Possibilities:
Beloit (Wisconsin)
Earlham (Ohio)
Grinnell (Iowa)
Kalamazoo (Michigan)
Kenyon (Ohio)
Knox College (Illinois)
Lawrence University (Wisconsin)
Macalester (Minnesota)
Oberlin (Ohio)</p>
<p>Beloit, Knox, and Lawrence are need-blind, full-need schools ([Need-blind</a> admission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need-blind_admission]Need-blind”>Need-blind admission - Wikipedia)). They should be realistic targets for your stats. Grinnell, Kenyon, Macalester, and Oberlin are more selective than the others. All of these schools are likely to be more generous with need-based aid than OOS public universities. Depending on your family circumstances, their net costs may be lower than some in-state public schools. The average total cost to attend Grinnell, after average need-based aid, is about $19K. </p>
<p>Are these schools as good as Michigan for a pre-med/life science student? Grinnell and Earlham are among the nation’s top 10 schools for production of PhDs per capita in the life sciences. Midwestern LACs that have produced at least 30 PhDs in the biological sciences in 2006-2010:<br>
Carleton (79 for an annual enrollment of ~2000 undergraduates)
Oberlin (66)
Grinnell (58)
St. Olaf (53)
Colorado College (42)
Ohio Wesleyan (37)
Kalamazoo (36)
College of Wooster (32)
Macalester (32)
Augustana (30)
Earlham (30)</p>
<p>Compare to:
University of Michigan (228 for an annual enrollment of ~27K undergraduates)</p>
<p>Carleton, Oberlin, Grinnell and St. Olaf, with total undergraduate enrollments of < 10K students, produced 256 PhDs in the biological sciences in 2006-2010. That’s more than Michigan did, even though Michigan has approximately triple the undergraduate enrollment of these 4 schools put together.
Source: <a href=“https://webcaspar.nsf.gov/[/url]”>https://webcaspar.nsf.gov/</a></p>
<p>In the last 4 years, Carleton, Oberlin, Grinnell, and Kalamazoo together placed as many graduates into the entering classes at Vanderbilt Medical School as UMichigan did, despite Michigan’s much larger enrollments. (<a href=“https://medschool.vanderbilt.edu/admissions/undergraduate-schools-represented[/url]”>https://medschool.vanderbilt.edu/admissions/undergraduate-schools-represented</a>)</p>
<p>About 60-70% of classes at these LACs have less than 20 students. 0%-4% or so have 50 or more. At Michigan, the corresponding numbers are ~48% and 17% respectively. These numbers probably understate the discrepancy because of the relatively large number of low-enrollment upper-level classes at a school like Michigan. You’re likely to find much larger enrollments at Michigan, and correspondingly less faculty attention, in your entry and intermediate bio, chem, physics and math courses.</p>