GOP and Man at Yale

<p>

<a href=“http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_11_06/cover.html[/url]”>http://www.amconmag.com/2006/2006_11_06/cover.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>

</p>

<p>von Mises, Hayak and Rand I am somewhat familiar with, but I will have to brush up on Weaver, Nock and Kirk.</p>

<p>The response from liberals to the article is already predictable, but what do conservatives think?</p>

<p>

While this is no doubt true for students of many differing political persuasions, the article basically asks: Why can’t today’s college conservatives be more like Pat Buchanan? It’s an article that argues for paleo-conservatism as opposed to neo-conservativism, using the Iraq “intervention” as its proxy, an not really allowing for any middle ground within conservative thought–orthodoxy or the highway, so to speak.</p>

<p>I share your reading experience, 2dsdad, although I did read Albert Jay Nock’s “Our Enemy, The State” once upon a time–a much more thoughtful book than its radical-sounding title would suggest. Which leads to another question–why don’t modern comparative politics courses on college campuses delve more deeply into “the wisdom of the contemporary Right’s founding generation”? I think we know the answer. Who would teach the course? The only conservative professor named in the article is Jeffrey Hart, now emeritus at Dartmouth.</p>

<p>

I read Russell Kirk’s “The Conservative Mind” last summer. A very good book.</p>

<p>

…I suppose it would be bad form to show off here.</p>