<p>I have the option of taking 5 or 6 math and physics classes next semester (the sixth is a masters-level graduate algebra course) and research, so I’m wondering what would be more favorable for a top-level physics (or math) grad school (PhD): 5 classes with all A’s, 6 classes with possibly a couple B’s, or 5 classes with research and maybe a B.</p>
<p>I ask this specifically because I’m a sophomore with a 4.0, and I want to know if it’s worth it to throw away the 4.0 for research and advanced classes. I would also like to know not just for this semester, but also future semesters.</p>
<p>research and grad courses will be more preferable than having a 4.0. if your gpa drops a bit its ok. it won’t keep you out of a grad school, but having no research experience will.</p>
<p>Research exp >>> grades for (physics) PhD. As long the GPA is not too bad (3.6+), having 1st author/co author/2nd author publication in at least mid-level impact factor journal will give you the upper hand vs other applicants at top university.</p>
<p>So in order of preference:
4 classes with grade 2A 2B, with 1st>co publication>2nd pub
5 classes with research (no publication, just research) with 4 A and 1 B</p>
<p>The two above is way better than
5 classes with A
6 classes with 2 Bs</p>
<p>That’s for Physics PhD. For math PhD, someone should CMIIW but based on hearsay (I read somewhere in this forum) it’s better if you take more class since math research is different.</p>
<p>Thank you for your responses.</p>
<p>Also to clarify, I have been involved in physics research this past summer, but I don’t think students in this field (CERN particle physics analysis) publish often. I probably won’t be doing math research unless (until) I decide physics is not for me.</p>