<p>^I haven’t studied them to know…I had just happened upon this one and went to it on a lark, given it seemed pretty comprehensive. I’ve since written to ask them about why their formula is producing such bad results, but never heard back.</p>
<p>What I would do however is not worry about online ranking machines, which often can be very broad brush and produced by outsiders, and instead do one’s own investigative work that will yield results very specific to one’s field and area of interest. Its at that level that it matters. </p>
<p>To do so, here are some ideas: </p>
<p>a) talk to faculty at one’s current school (faculty who publish a lot in the field one is interested in going into). Strong graduate school candidates are those who have already been doing research with faculty, so those are perfect people to talk to. They will know exactly where the hot spots are for research in their area and will and should mentor you through the process. If possible, talk to several, as you will get some varying opinion since its not entirely cut in stone but some very common patterns will emerge about the best schools.</p>
<p>b) identify the top journals in one’s field, through asking well published faculty or by looking at journal impact factors in Web of Science (ISI) (available in any online university library). </p>
<p>c) identify where those publishing in those top journals are currently working and check out their websites. </p>
<p>d) also using Web of science, one can identify researchers with the highest citation rates in their field…and see where they are working, who their colleagues are and what their citation rates are. </p>
<p>d) even better, if one has a particular passion about a particular topic within one’s field of interest, identify the topic researchers publishing on that topic in leading journals, and where they are located. You can also write to them directly to consider joining their research team. </p>
<p>e) Finally, only go to a school that can provide you with decent financial support, and that doesn’t just use up its graduate students as cheap labor to teach a ton during their PhD studies. It varies by field, but the best programs will protect PhD students from teaching as much as possible (relative to other schools in that field), and some of the worse programs will have their students teaching so much for so little than they aren’t able to get on with their own education. (as but one example, our students only teach in their 4th year one course or two; I know some schools in our same field- schools whose name you would recognize as ‘well known’, that have their students teaching 4 courses a year from the get go…that to me is just exploitation). </p>
<p>IMHO, the ranking of undergraduate schools and differential quality between them is wayyyy overrated. But when it comes to one’s PhD, its a whole different story. Reputation and the quality of faculty in terms of their research within a field matters a ton. In a given field, there will be huge variation across schools in terms of the amount and quality of research produced, the amount and quality of research that graduate students will be able to produce, and most importantly, the training and job outcomes its graduates will receive.</p>