GW 2009 Admissions Numbers Stable

<p>

</p>

<p>[Admissions</a> steady in rocky times](<a href=“http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2009/04/02/News/Admissions.Steady.In.Rocky.Times-3694049.shtml]Admissions”>http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2009/04/02/News/Admissions.Steady.In.Rocky.Times-3694049.shtml) by Rachel Barker.</p>

<p>CC mentioned in last paragraph, too.</p>

<p>I did not need to know that the 37% acceptance rate included ED. That sucks.</p>

<p>Please explain, What sucks? I’m missing somethings.</p>

<p>It sucks because it means the RD rate is even lower than 37%.</p>

<p>It’s true. ED acceptance rate hovers around 50%. So yes, RD will be less than the 37% quoted. If GW is truly your first choice, and finaid is not a deal breaker- go ED or EDII.</p>

<p>The admissions rate may have been stable, but the yield went up about 2%.</p>

<p>[More</a> submit freshman deposits - News](<a href=“http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2009/06/11/News/More-Submit.Freshman.Deposits-3747304.shtml]More”>http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2009/06/11/News/More-Submit.Freshman.Deposits-3747304.shtml)</p>

<p>I was accepted ED I this year. SAT was 1800, gpa was around 3.6.
If you really want to go to GW, ED I or II is the best way to go.</p>

<p>idk i mean 37% is an intermediate level of acceptance rate. it’s not ridiculously low now a very easy admit for most applicants. i got in RD and will likely go next year.</p>

<p>To Maho - you do realize this is 2009 data. Class of 2013.</p>

<p>This was covered in another thread - 31.5% admitted this year (2010).</p>

<p>yea but it still relates to this year. collegeboard posts 37% admit rate this year and it was the same last year so my comment stands</p>

<p>Collegeboard does not yet reflect the admit rate of the class of 2014. You can go to this article if you want the details.
[Acceptance</a> rate hits historic low - News](<a href=“http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2010/04/05/News/Acceptance.Rate.Hits.Historic.Low-3899804.shtml]Acceptance”>http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2010/04/05/News/Acceptance.Rate.Hits.Historic.Low-3899804.shtml)</p>

<p>Wrong, Mahomushi.</p>

<p>ok schmohawk, my mistake.</p>