Harry Potter is nothing more than a jock legacy with a trust fund

<p>Just read an article like this on Slate, and it articulated what I felt all this time.</p>

<p>And that is that despite the books’ pretensions, we should empathize with Draco Malfoy’s jealousy and hatred for Harry, than embrace the Boy Who Lived as some kind of everyman hero. Remember that rich guy in high school who coasted through everything because he could throw the football 60 yards? That’s pretty much Harry, sans the sex appeal. </p>

<p>Let’s just summarize his “accomplishments”.</p>

<p>1) Surviving Voldemort’s attack</p>

<ul>
<li>his mother did all the work</li>
<li>only accomplishment would have been being cute enough to make said mother sacrifice herself for him, but then again, that’s natural parental instinct</li>
</ul>

<p>2) Thwarting Voldemort’s attempt to steal the Philosopher’s Stone</p>

<ul>
<li>wouldn’t have gotten anywhere without inheriting the invisibility cloak</li>
<li>was on the wrong trail until the end (i.e. Snape)</li>
<li>could only solve 1 out of the 4 obstacles (Hermione knew how to put Fluffy to sleep, escape from the entangling vines, and Ron won the chess game)</li>
<li>again, at the final fight, his mother did all the work, blessing him with incendiary skin</li>
</ul>

<p>3) Tom Riddle’s Diary</p>

<ul>
<li>again, displays a lack of mind for detective work, suspecting Draco, even Hagrid, of being the heir of Slytherin, before realizing the truth at the final confrontation</li>
<li>Dumbledore had to aid him with powerful weapons, such as Fawkes and the sword of Gryffindor</li>
<li>could not even hope to defeat the basilisk until Fawkes blinded the beast</li>
<li>granted, he eventually killed the monster, so that’s partial credit</li>
</ul>

<p>4) Aiding Sirus Black</p>

<ul>
<li>again, relies heavily on smart brave friends (Hermione) and powerful magical items that he did not make or find (time-turner and Marauder’s map)</li>
</ul>

<p>I could go on and on, but I think you all get the gist of it. Harry Potter is really good at three things: making loyal and useful friends, inheriting really cool stuff, and flying a broom. (Hell, leave out the last part and you have Dubya himself!) For this, he is worshipped by the magical community within, and the reading world on the outside. If I could rollerblade well, have Q from 007 as my benefactor, and hire a bodyguard, I could be the savior of the world as well!</p>

<p>Anyway, the only thing Harry can take credit for is that A) he has good judgment of character and B) he’s a good athlete, sort of. Point A is barely a credit since he did not seek out Ron Weasley as much as he was forced to share a cabin with him on a train to Hogwarts; the same goes with Hermione Granger. Point B is his only true accomplishment, yet nobody wants to root for the jock with the massive inheritance. But who are we fooling outselves here? Harry never has money problems, he is a gloryhound on the pitch, and he is foolishly idolized by millions.</p>

<p>I propose that we should push Harry out of the limelight and instead recognize the triumphs of his friends for a change. Ron Weasley is a success story from the lower classes, while Hermione Granger fights the prejudice of blood purity.</p>

<p>Wow, excellent points!</p>

<p>Let’s analyze Frodo next.</p>

<p>(I hope that didn’t come across as sarcastic - it was not meant to. I am actually serious - the author of that article did some really good work on that analysis.)</p>

<p>^^you know you can just edit your posts instead of making consecutive posts every minute. </p>

<p>But if Harry doesn’t really have many good qualities, why do so many people in real life like him? Is it the same instinct that makes people want to be close to the popular kids?</p>

<p>Good question. I dunno. The books were a romp. Fun. But got a little formulaic.</p>

<p>BTW, I’m a fan of Harry Potter and really like the books. But I find it humorous that when you analyze Harry, you can only conclude that he is what I said he is: a legacy jock with a trust fund. Not really the stuff of heroes, but I guess J.K. Rowling manages to conceal that awful truth well enough. At best, he’s a brave and tough guy who manages to deal with all the difficulties of life. At worst, he’s a glory hog who takes credit for things other people gave him or do for him.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Well, I think when people say I love Harry Potter, they’re referring to the books than the specific character. As for those who do like him, they like him for the same reason why people like frontmen and superstar athletes: they give the illusion of being heroes.</p>

<p>Huh. I can’t believe someone would spend so much time trying to discredit a fictional character. Huh. People never cease to amaze me.</p>

<p>BTW, I love Harry Potter, both the books and the character. What nbachris doesn’t seem to realize is that this is a work of fiction. Harry (the character) will always be idolized by millions, no matter if a few think all it is is a money-making scheme.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>If you say so it must be true. But really, Harry Potter, both the char. and the books, inspired millions to pick up a book and read. You’ve got to admit that is an valiant accomplishment in itself.</p>

<p>.-_-.</p>

<p>also, i think the author (j.k something) wanted harry to seem teenage like, with errors so he would seem more human, but yet magical at the same time- imo.</p>

<p>To err is human.
-A. Pope</p>

<p>Exactly. Rowling wanted a “real” character, which is what Harry is.</p>

<p>.-_-.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I’d give Harry a little more credit:</p>

<p>Fluffy = Hermione (i think)
Devil’s Snare = Hermione
Charmed Flying Keys = Harry
Chess Game = Ron
Potions Riddle = Hermione
Mirror of Erised = Harry</p>

<p>^^That sounds right.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>He didn’t do anything. It was because of his unselfish nature that he was able to “solve” the Mirror. Unselfishness is an admirable trait, but it’s not an accomplishment.</p>

<p>HELLO! Fiction!- Sorry if that is harsh, but come on.</p>

<p>.-_-.</p>

<p>^Was that your way of trying to end this discussion?</p>

<p>nbachris2788: He still accomplished the task (preventing Prof. Quirrell from retrieving the Sorcerer’s Stone), that’s my point. I’m just giving credit where credit is due.</p>

<p>^^It is important to make sure that people get the proper recognition.</p>

<p>Haha, this is an interesting way of looking at things.</p>

<p>Also, to the people who keep saying “fiction” and “people still love him,” I’m pretty sure that’s irrelevant. Literary criticism. Ever heard of it?</p>

<p>tommeister:Exactly. :)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Ron and Hermione did just as much as he did, yet they are largely unrecognized.</p>

<p>Because they are secondary characters and not the heroes of the books.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Actually Ron and Hermione were given 50 points each for “the best game of chess Hogwarts has ever seen” and “extraordinary use of cleverness” (or something like that) respectively. :rolleyes:</p>