<p>Nope. From what I gather, the concept may well be shot down as it could mean anything. Ethics and religion, but also biology, economic behavior, cultural practices, in other words, a real grab bag.</p>
<p>Yuck. I agree completely that learning “what it means to be human” may be the only way the world will ever make it to a post-nuclear age. But throwing out a grab bag of courses one can take in a sort of impoverished smorgasbord is certainly not the way to do it.</p>
<p>I once suggested that my institution require two semesters of “Shakespeare and Human Psychology,” and even volunteered to do all the work putting it together. It was shot down in flames and I was accused of being … well … some very nasty things. </p>
<p>So it means they are learning what it’s like to be one of us lesser folk? Do they have to spend a semester at a community college? Or working at Wal-Mart?</p>
<p>I hestitated to make the joke about being “super human” because I figured it had potential to offend someone at Harvard. But I figured, but didn’t mention, I was allowed, since I went to grad school at Harvard. </p>
<p>It is just that the terminology has a funny side to it.</p>
<p>Actually, I believe the terminology is not “What it is to be human?” but something along the lines of “What makes a human being?”</p>
<p>But if you want superhuman, Coureur has posted a link to a Crimson profile of some seniors. Some make it sound that their days have more than 24 hours in them!</p>