No question that you would get an excellent architecture education at either school. Whether you prefer the climate of upstate New York or eastern Texas is a personal preference. For what it’s worth my son who did his MArch at Cornell favored the campus’ natural beauty and opportunities for all season outdoorsy activities. You may feel differently.
If costs are actually more or less the same, then I think you need to probe more deeply into points of differentiation.
Prestige and name recognition are valid considerations, but both originate in the eye of the beholder. If your ultimate beholder is your future employer then I would say that it depends on where you see yourself settling and practicing architecture. A variety of outcomes are possible, so it’s difficult to predict where internships and school connections may lead you, but I’d give Cornell architecture the edge in northeast placements— especially New York —and in international prestige. Again, the practical impact of prestige is variable.
As I understand it, Rice’s program is basically a 4 year BA with a focus on architectural studies, followed by a 1 year internship then a 1 year wrap up for a BArch. This may offer a broader and deeper experience than a traditional 5 year BArch. Cornell students definitely gain real life experience through summer internships, but the system for securing internships is less structured than Rice’s. I would want to know more how preceptorship assignments are determined.
Another question I would ask Rice would be what percentage of 2nd years are admitted to the BArch track and what percentage of 4th years are admitted into the preceptorship and eventually receive the BArch. Is there a weeding out process? If yes, what are the criteria? I’m not an architect but my observation of the experiences of my son and his classmates and colleagues leads me to favor the BA/BS+MArch route (which you could still choose with a Rice BA).
I would also look into the resumes of the working architect faculty members, visiting professors and critics. These are the connections that will influence your future career.
I would compare the study away programs, both US based and international, especially costs and selectivity.
And lastly I would compare the synergy between the school of architecture and related disciplines like landscape, urban planning, art studio and art history. And if it turns out that architecture in general isn’t the right path for you, what other majors are available?
Two great options: you can’t make a bad choice, but one may be better for you than the other. Come back after your visits and let us know which you choose.