Dear all,
I’m from the UK and applying to Claremont McKenna, U-Penn, Princeton, Dartmouth, and University of Chicago (I’m only looking at top-tier schools in US given the high tuition fees and the fact that I’ll, almost definitely, have offers from top UK universities and quite possibly Oxford).
My application is strong with 12 A* GCSE (and equivalent) , and AAA*A A level predictions which translate roughly to a perfect GPA (as per the Harvard documents released in the court case) and roughly 8 5’s in AP’s (I’m guessing this based off what qualifies for college credit and the fact that the syllabus covered in 2 AP’s roughly equals to 1 A level). After a lot of time planning and thinking, I finally thought of an original idea for CA essay; its well written and conveys a ‘unique voice’ - teachers and college consultants have said it is definitely strong. My supplements come across well-researched and mature (quite similar to UCAS PS only showing knowledge of the universities too). ECs show a strong passion and dedication to Economics and also show a lot of demonstrated leadership and ability to work as a team (plus a bit of sport, volunteering, prestige awards, internships …). Both of my teacher recs have been assured to be among the strongest they’ve written and show my strong attitude towards learning (although I, of course, can’t read them) (one was also written by a teacher who also holds an important role in the school’s upper management). So essentially it is a strong application…
…with the exception of my 31 ACT.
U of C allows international applicants to apply with A level predicted grades in lieu of test scores so I’d consider myself a strong applicant there, however, CMC, Penn, Dartmouth, and Princeton do of course require standardized testing and thus, the quality of my application has fallen significantly.
Originally I thought that most people don’t finish any sections of the test (as I thought it was a measure of how well you work against the clock and certainly not intelligence given that the questions themselves really are not difficult), and that my test score was low because I didn’t prepare adequately for it with practice tests (I did maybe 2/3 practices before it).
Recently, upon struggling with time in some internal school exams (when no one else did), my form tutor recommended that I see our school’s learning support department to see if there was a possibility that I had a learning difficulty. From the initial diagnosis, they said they were almost certain I had a learning difficulty that would entitle me to extra time in UK exams and therefore in US exams (including standardized testing) too.
The issue is that seeing an educational psychologist and getting a formal diagnosis will take quite a long time and College Board (I plan on switching to the SAT) says that it takes up to 7 weeks for the request to process - so essentially it will be impossible for me to get these accommodations through normal channels for the December test.
I hope to get a score in the 75th percentile of Princeton/ Penn i.e. a 1550 SAT (which given my score without extra time, the scores of others at my school who do get extra time, and generally being clever, I think is certainly possible)
I think I have several choices and was hoping people could share their advice on how I should proceed:
(1) Take December SAT (which is slightly less time pressured than ACT) without accommodations - work very hard through December to try and make up for my learning and timing difficulty (Risky and score would be sent straight to schools)
(2) Try and get the College Board to give me the extra time provision in the short space of time maybe anyone has experience in doing this?
(3) Explain my situation to the admissions officers and hope they understand and then simply neglect my score and focus on the important parts of my application (or even maybe allow me to send in late scores from January/ February when I would have extra time provision?) (If pursuing this strategy then should I take Dec SAT as well or not?) (Risk in admissions officers treating my learning and timing difficulty as a negative which they could use to justify a rejection)
Thank you in advance for any help/ advice you may be able to give!