<p>PT3S9
pg554</p>
<li>I put C, but the answer is A</li>
<li>How the hell can you tell between B,D, and E? they seem almost the same to me…</li>
</ol>
<ol>
<li>I just don’t see complacency from the description. B,D and E are way off.</li>
<li>it tells you in the lines it gives you. Clayton is not a good cook, but a good cellist.
“In that raunchy kitchen, elbows propped on either side of the cooling soup, he was fidgety, even a little awkward.” — not good with kitchen or “clumsiness”
“But when he sat up hebind his instrumeent, he had the irresistible beauty of… blah blah”----------gracefulness.</li>
</ol>
<p>EDIT: B: excellence might work, but Clayton’s kitchen skills are below mediocre
D: He’s bad with the kitchen doesn’t mean he’s lazy.</p>
<p>oh, i see where you got that. I was looking at “he heated up a can of soup, and plunked the cheese down in the center of the dining table.” i thought that mediocrity was the only way to describe that, didn’t see the thing in the last paragraph x_x</p>
<p>“as if the shades swirled just under the surface”
i don’t see how that is a description of his complicated nature…</p>
<p>oh, and thanks for the quick answer :)</p>