<p>I am an Ohio landlord and I can answer most of your questions based on my Ohio experience, but I am not a lawyer, or more specifically a Colorado lawyer. I’ll call the roommates Tim and Tom.</p>
<h1>1 if concerned, send payment through post office with confirmation of delivery, and allow time for mailing delays. That will document the date delivered. Be careful about postdating checks. In many states it is illegal to write a postdated check. Although landlord would probably accept it, he wouldn’t have to. He could mail it back, asking for a correctly written check. Then, by the time he gets the proper one, the rent might be late and a late fee due! Also- while the $50 late fee is legal and common, adding an extra $10 day is not enforced in Ohio. That means a landlord can legally put that in the lease, but a judge is not likely to enforce it. In Ohio that is considered unconsciencable and not enforceable.</h1>
<h1>2 No. You are looking at this as if the landlord had a contract with Tim, and also has a contract with Tom. Not true. He is providing one rental unit and has one contract, and it is with both Tim and Tom. That is why the 2 roommates are not considered independant of each other. Unless stated otherwise, both tenants are usually considered jointly and separately liable for the bills. How is that fair? Well, if a landlord has Tim and Tom as roommates, but only Tim pays his share, then the landlord would be out for 1/2 of the costs that Tom failed to pay. Did the landlord furnish only 1/2 of the unit? Did the landlord furnish 1/2 of the winter heater? - that is- if the thermostat was set on 70, did it actually heat only to 35? No. Both tenants in the unit got full use of the unit. The landlord is entitled to his full payment. Tenants cannot get away with “I paid my share, you’ll have to get the other portion from Tom”. In that case, Tim would need to be paying 100% and yes, thats more than his share, but it is Tom that stiffed Tim- not the landlord. Then, if Tim wished, he could take Tom to court for not having paid his fair share. Think of it that not only do Tim and Tom have a contract with the landlord, but also with each other. Thats why one has to use care when selecting a roommate. Also- if any court action ever occurs, even if one has paid his full share and the other hasn’t, the court action is usually against both tenants, and a judgment against them is public record, and will most likely be printed in the local newspaper(embarrassing), and not only that but it is usually sent to the credit bureaus as a bad debt and can affect both tenants’ credit rating for years. So if there is a dispute try hard to find a compromise rather than going to court.</h1>
<ol>
<li> If the only writing relating to appliances is exactly as you have shown, then landlord is reponsible for appliance repairs that are normal wear. Tenant could be considered responsible if not keeping unit “in good order and good condition” contributed to the breakdown, and tenant is responsible if “damaged by resident”, but none of those would include normal wear. Example 1: A tenant cooking is distracted from stove when phone rings. Grease fire happens, damaging wall, stove, and an upper cabinet. that is all tenants’ bill. Example 2: if the heating element fails in the old hot water heater due to its age, that is normal wear. Unless it states otherwise in the lease, the landlord is responsible for the repair -due- to normal wear- of any of the appliances he provides. Keep in mind too, that “damaged by the tenant” also includes their guests. If tenants are hosting an “Animal House toga party” and a guest breaks a window, and another breaks the door on the dishwasher, then the tenants are responsible to the landlord for those damages. Tenants cannot get away with “We didn’t break it, Crazy Joe did. He lives in Alaska. Get the cost of repair from him.” That won’t work.</li>
</ol>
<p>On a side note- just this weekend, a tenant called me late Thursday (the 3rd) for emergency repair- her toilet would not flush out and some nasty water was running over. I immediately called on a plumber, he serviced her toilet the very next day, on the holiday. He found a childs’ toy was jamming up the toilet drain. As soon as he bills me, and I know it will be BIG BIG BIG for a service call on a holiday, I will forward the cost onto the tenant. A childs toy in the drain is NOT normal wear that a landlord is responsible for.</p>
<p>Any more questions or clarifications you are welcome to p.m. me, I’ll answer as best I know based on my Ohio experience.</p>