High school class of 2016

<p>@gbrl10: That is going to be a HARD schedule if that’s what you’re thinking of for junior year. Just IMHO, though.</p>

<p>@TeamRocketGrunt: It sucks that you still have to go. :confused: At least you won’t have to make-up all the days though? And I’m not watching because my mom is using the TV. I probably should, since I’m going to debate class tomorrow and we’ll probably be discussing it. =P Honestly though, you seem like EXACTLY the kind of person that could get that merit scholarship!!</p>

<p>@TheAtlantic: I’m so happy that I’m not the only one who procrastinates excessively on debate. </p>

<p>I FINISHED MY HOMEWORK EARLY TONIGHT. HALLELUJAH. I’m working on an essay, and am going to start homework that’s due Thursday. I don’t even remember the last time I had this kind of time. :wink: It’s quite nice. I’m also going to do some PSAT/SAT prep as well. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Sometimes the truth hurts</p>

<p>@Almondjoy7, my mom lets me stay home on days that should be holidays anyway, so no make up days for me :smiley:
I dunno if I’ll get it. My main EC, research, hasn’t been going well lately; I haven’t been to the lab in a couple of months, and my professor hasn’t gotten back to me about the work release. If this research doesn’t work out, my only leverage for merit scholarships goes out the door. :(</p>

<p>I’m curious; what makes me seem like I’ll get the scholarship?</p>

<p>//
I’m having so much fun coming up with these BarackObama “tweets.”</p>

<p>@BarackObama announces initiatives to raise the minimum wage, plan retirement, and crucify babies at every road intersection. #StateoftheUnion</p>

<p>ap psych, reg physics, hon pre calc, reg english, apush, ap human geo.</p>

<p>How does this schedule seem for junior year? </p>

<p>@Almondjoy7 It’s part of my senior year schedule. I probably shouldn’t be worring about it now, but I always like to plan ahead. I wish we didn’t have to have an earth science credit, then I wouldn’t have to take APES, and I could fit AP Chem in my junior year schedule. </p>

<p>IT IS NEGATIVE THIRTEEN DEGREES CELSIUS, AND WE’RE STILL HAVING SCHOOL.</p>

<p>ASGJJLJXYHBKFIHKDSTHKOFINLGK</p>

<p>School closed tomorrow. There is a God. </p>

<p>@grbl10 - They logically would complement each other pretty well. I’m planning on taking those same classes next year!</p>

<p>Not to spark controversy or anything, but what political views do you all hold?</p>

<p>I’m pretty liberal. I’m technically a member of the young Democrats club at my school, but I haven’t been able to go to many of them because of my sport. </p>

<p>Pro-Choice, pro legalization of weed, (no, I don’t smoke). And pro background checks on firearms. </p>

<p>Socially liberal. Economically moderate.</p>

<p>I’m a moderate. If I had to classify myself, I’d say I’m fiscally conservative but socially progressive. I do support a free market economy but, at the same time, I think that abortion should be a choice and that stricter gun control policies are needed. There are some liberal social viewpoints I do not agree with (no, every crime involving two different races isn’t a hate crime and no, there’s really no such thing as white privilege. In fact, I’d say whites are at a disadvantage in the context of this site). I’m for legal immigration, I believe homosexuals should be allowed to marry, etc. I also believe that people seem to be making up sexualities in an attempt to copulate with anything.</p>

<p>Before anyone accuses me of being privileged scum, I’d just like to point out that I’m Asian.</p>

<p>I’m the lazyest person…</p>

<p>

How…? I’ve always seen whites as having significantly more privilege, especially in the context of college admissions. I’d go as far as to say that the reason why Asians have such a disadvantage is BECAUSE of whites. Most highly selective schools have a 25% Asian population maximum at the undergrad level, with a 60% or so white demographic. Let’s say an Asian student and a white student have the same socioeconomic background; an Asian Intel finalist is seen as typical and mediocre, while a white Intel finalist would be seen as a genius of sort. I’m not trying to say that Asians have higher standards or achieve at a higher level or whatever (because they don’t - achievement is at an individual level, not at a racial level), I’m arguing that being an Asian and applying to a top-tier school DOES hurt your chances of getting accepted and being white is an advantage.</p>

<p>It’s popular belief that African Americans and Hispanics have a MUCH easier chance of getting accepted to college (I believe they do to some degree only because there are less AA/H applicants), but almost everyone neglects how easy it is for a white student to gain admission, too, relative to an Asian student. Alright, I should probably end my affirmative action rant here because I’m getting very off-topic.</p>

<p>How I feel this conversation would end up:

<a href=“http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png[/img]”>http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png

</a></p>

<p>It’s the very perception of “white privilege” that puts whites at a relative disadvantage. It is assumed that, by virtue of their race, whites have some sort of upper hand; therefore, much more is expected from them. You see this same mentality with Asians, but to a greater extent. Basically, this fits the quote, "From those to whom much is given, much is expected.” Whites are automatically assumed to be at a better socioeconomic status by many proponents of “white privilege.” There was actually an article I read the other day in which the author argued that even poor white people have privilege, so it’s not socioeconomic strictly. You can cut the “economic” part right out without making a difference.</p>

<p>I’d really not like to get into a debate over AA, white privilege, etc. </p>

<p>Perception isn’t a disadvantage, cause there needs to be an impact made off of those perceptions. And the perceptions are only made because society has equally harmful views of those that aren’t “privileged”. If you can’t show the statistical harms that AA has on whites (though it benefits Caucasian females more than any other group) and can’t show how it outweighs say…racial profiling or other issues the "non-priveliged’ have to deal with, then who really cares about the argument? From a There’s not a lot of “white privilege” where I live, but there sure is a lot of racism which I’ve heard/seen firsthand. Regardless, I really don’t care. And I will refer you all back to xkcd comic 386 (which I provided a picture of above).</p>

<p>Now, does anyone else love ICEEs?

<a href=“http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yf4AfXM5MF4/UWLsekJ9gjI/AAAAAAAADn8/T800azTiqBI/s640/icee.jpg[/img]”>http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yf4AfXM5MF4/UWLsekJ9gjI/AAAAAAAADn8/T800azTiqBI/s640/icee.jpg

</a></p>

<p>Eh. It boils down to how you look at it.</p>

<p>Yeah, I used to strictly adhere to blue raspberry but cherry is alright now, too. :D</p>

<p>Also, does anyone have experience with AMC/will be doing AMC this year?</p>

<p>Cherry and Coke for me</p>

<p>I wouldn’t know, sorry</p>

<p>Explain how AA “benefits Caucasian females more than any other group.”</p>

<p>The harm that AA has on whites is based on the very fact that AA is race based. AA benefits minorities who are from upper/middle class backgrounds because these minorities are often assumed to be “disadvantaged.” This is a stereotype: the minority is automatically assumed to be disadvantaged based on the color of his/her skin. By attempting to combat racism/stereotyping and help the “disadvantaged,” AA actually perpetuates stereotyping.</p>

<p>These preferences hurt poor whites and many Asians because the number of Asian applicants who meet these requirements is disproportionately high. If AA was meant to aid the “disadvantaged,” it would be based on actual disadvantage (economic status) rather than race. Being a certain race does not automatically put you in a certain economic caste. There are those who argue that AA increases “diversity” in a student body. Is it this same push for diversity that led Stanford, UC Berkeley, and Cornell to create segregated dormitories? (<a href=“http://www.stanford.edu/dept/rde/cgi-bin/drupal/housing/housing/theme-and-focus-houses”>http://www.stanford.edu/dept/rde/cgi-bin/drupal/housing/housing/theme-and-focus-houses&lt;/a&gt; ; <a href=“http://www.housing.berkeley.edu/livingatcal/themeprograms.html”>http://www.housing.berkeley.edu/livingatcal/themeprograms.html&lt;/a&gt; ; <a href=“Cornell Dorms Based on Race Are the Focus Of an Inquiry - The New York Times”>http://www.nytimes.com/1995/03/16/nyregion/cornell-dorms-based-on-race-are-the-focus-of-an-inquiry.html&lt;/a&gt;)</p>

<p>Diversity in the context of college admissions means the addition of unique ideas or characteristics; therefore, the push for diversity should be based on individual characteristics, NOT race. It is idiotic to think that only minority races are able to add ideas that differ from the majority’s. This idea that only minorities are able to offer fresh perspective is, in and of itself, a form of racism.</p>

<p>AA is, inherently, racism for the sake of combating racism. It is, in and of itself, racial profiling. It assumes that only members of minority races are able to contribute unique ideas to a student body and that, to increase diversity, it should be on a race basis rather than an individualized basis. It assumes that one is disadvantaged by virtue of one’s minority race and, conversely, that one is advantaged by virtue of one’s majority race. The phrase “white privilege” is erroneous because it asserts that, by virtue of race, a group of people have privilege. It is this perception that puts these people at an immediate disadvantage.</p>

<p>A goal of a college is to admit individuals on the basis of merit and achievement; race has no bearing on one’s merit and scope of achievements and has no place in college admissions. However, AA is so pervasive that race does become an issue and, more often than not, those who are perceived as privileged due to their race, even when they are not, suffer while those who are perceived as disadvantaged due to their race, even if they are not, are given advantages. </p>

<p>"Perhaps the most tragic side effect of affirmative action is that very significant achievements of minority students can become compromised. It is often not possible to tell whether a given student genuinely deserved admission to Stanford, or whether he is there by virtue of fitting into some sort of diversity matrix. When people do start to suspect the worst – that preferences have skewed the entire class – they are accused of the very racism that justifies these preferences. It is a strange cure that generates its own disease.</p>

<p>A Stanford without affirmative action will be a Stanford in which the question of who belongs here will no longer need to be answered. It will no longer need to be answered because it will no longer need to be asked, not even sotto voce ."</p>

<p>I like ICEEs, actually. Haven’t had one in a while though.</p>