<p>At least her taste is outstanding. This could get her my vote. A new standard in “first lady”.</p>
<p>[“Not</a> Just Republicans Spreading Rumors About Hillary’s Lesbian Affair” by Ken Silverstein (Harper’s Magazine)](<a href=“http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/11/hbc-90001616]"Not”>Page not found | Harper's Magazine)</p>
<p>^ Maybe that is why she is possibly getting support from another famous woman. Maybe this woman doesn’t see her as a threat… :rolleyes:</p>
<p>[The</a> Associated Press: Gennifer Flowers Mulls Vote for Clinton](<a href=“http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i4peHsbZvf7E6lsS37JBIBSXAQTgD8TC7DT00]The”>http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i4peHsbZvf7E6lsS37JBIBSXAQTgD8TC7DT00)</p>
<p>I don’t understand why this makes the AP news. Is it a good thing or not if Gennifer Flowers supports Hillary? Who benefits from that support?</p>
<p>This cracks me up. It’s not “just Repbulicans” but Democrats vying against her for the nomination! Well, then it must be true.</p>
<p>Is this all they can come up with? </p>
<p>People are jealous of Hillary because she has it all; college degree, law degree, husband, mother and a lesbian lover!</p>
<p>A lot of the women who hate her so much are bitter because their lives are not as excited as Hillary.</p>
<p>does it really matter? </p>
<p>If they say no, do you believe em senator craig? </p>
<p>I don’t really care what any of them like to do for hits and giggles, I want to know how much finanical pain or pleasure they are going to bring my way. I want to know if they are going to send my kids to war, require cleaner air, better more efficient fuels, their plans about jobs and education…etc…</p>
<p>What they do to get off, very, very very low on my list… I don’t think any of my priorities require a heterosexual or a homosexual to make them work.</p>
<p>“A lot of the women who hate her so much are bitter because their lives are not as excited as Hillary.”</p>
<p>very true. none of the republican first ladies had ‘IT’</p>
<p>From Post #2 …“Is it a good thing or not if Gennifer Flowers supports Hillary? Who benefits from that support?”</p>
<p>Hillary…a vote is a vote</p>
<p>The whole Hillary is gay thing is real class…I am glad you all are enjoying it…</p>
<p>When I have the time Ill describe how the Republicans start and spread rumors like this …they have been doing it for many years and have a pretty pat system for spreading rumors like this …its nothing new just the same old mud …</p>
<p>“it’s nothing new just the same old mud……”</p>
<p>It takes a mudslinger to know mud - like your recent attempt to smear Trent Lott with his indicted BIL (which unfortunately backfired when it turned out that he was a Hillary campaign contributor) or Mitt Romney with the crazy assertion that he had broken the law by hiring a contractor who employs illegal aliens.</p>
<p>Re post 8<br>
It takes a mudslinger to know mud - like your recent attempt to smear Trent Lott with his indicted BIL (which unfortunately backfired when it turned out that he was a Hillary campaign contributor</p>
<p>Mr. Lotts BIL was indicted .as for backfiring I dont care the effect it had or has on the Clinton campaign so it didnt backfire as far I care</p>
<p>Remember my facts were and are correct .</p>
<p>Mitt Romney with the crazy assertion that he had broken the law by hiring a contractor who employs illegal aliens …</p>
<p>You will recall I said I would apologize if some could show me Mr. Romney had not broken the law </p>
<p>I have never seen anyone on your side of the spectrum offer to apologize if they are shown to be wrong …nor have I seen on your side of the spectrum apologize when they have been show to be wrong .</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>[Romney</a> says he didn’t hire illegal help - Yahoo! News](<a href=“http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071208/ap_on_el_pr/romney_workers]Romney”>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071208/ap_on_el_pr/romney_workers)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Tapping toes, waiting for that apology.</p>
<p>sjmom: Though we’re on the opposite side of most issues, great post.</p>
<p>tommybill: You are very tiresome.</p>
<p>Still waiting patiently…</p>
<p>
No, not by a longshot. But sex sells. Lesbian sex…even more so. Lies, billing records, lies, FBI files, lies,cattle futures, lies,…boring. A young, beautiful aide & the former First Lady having a lesbian affair? Definitely not boring. Maybe this woman will be a more loyal mate than Bill ever was. It’s certainly less tawdry than ■■■■■■■■ for sex in public bathrooms.</p>
<p>I said, Mitt Romney broke the law when he hired illegal immigrants to do yard work at his estate. Mr Romney denies any responsibility for hiring illegal immigrants as workers at his home, insisting it was the fault of contractors. </p>
<p>I will take Mr. Romney at his word; if he says he didnt do it, I will believe him. I offer an apology to Mr Romney and anyone else offended by my misunderstanding of the circumstances of the illegal immigrants who where doing yard work at Mr Romney estate.</p>
<p>I have to agree with Mitt on this one. We are all in the same boat here. When a contractor shows up at our homes where the entire work force is Hispanic we do not run out and insist on documentation. And given that we know that there are nearby areas where day laborers congregate in hopes of work makes the situation even more problematic for we consumers of services.</p>
<p>I’ll give the Mittster a pass on this one.</p>
<p>Thank you, tommy.</p>
<p>By the way, I don’t like Hillary Clinton, but I think it is unfair to question her orientation. There’s no way for her to deny it, without looking like she has a problem with gay or lesbian people, or that she is “protesting too much.”</p>
<p>There’s enough to criticize her about without going in this directions.</p>
<p>On 12/5 I said the following It will be interesting to see how the economic royalists in the Republican Party try to deal with Huck. They are split among themselves and as such dont have the control of the party they are use to having.</p>
<p>Below we are beginning to see how the economic royalists in the Republican Party are going to deal with Huck</p>
<p>From the Huffington Post
His shot at the Republican presidential nomination in jeopardy, Mitt Romney will begin running a TV ad against Iowa front-runner Mike Huckabee on illegal immigration starting Tuesday while weighing how much negative campaigning he can add to the methodical plan he’s followed all year.
The ad says the former governors have a lot in common _ but not on illegal immigration, an important issue in Iowa, which will lead off nomination voting with its caucuses on Jan. 3.
“Mitt Romney stood up, and vetoed in-state tuition for illegal aliens, opposed driver’s licenses for illegals,” the ad says. “Mike Huckabee? Supported in-state tuition benefits for illegal immigrants. Huckabee even supported taxpayer-funded college scholarships for illegal aliens.”
“On immigration, the choice matters,” the ad ends.
With Huckabee surging in Iowa _ and showing strength nationally as well _ Romney offers positive as well as negative words on his rival.
“Two former governors. Two good family men. Both pro-life. Both support a constitutional amendment protecting traditional marriage,” the ad says _ then it focuses on what it says are stark differences on illegal immigration.</p>
<p>Read more: </p>
<p>[Romney</a> to Run Ad Against Huckabee - Politics on The Huffington Post](<a href=“HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News | HuffPost”>HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News | HuffPost)</p>
<p>I did ask my roofer if all the workers were legal. He said they were & I wasn’t about to go checking green cards. This roofer has had the same crew for years, pays them a bonus for particular tasks, and joins them on the jobsites. He’s even learned to speak Spanish. They were all from Guatemala & would run around our steep roof like mountain goats, carrying heavy packs of shingles. I was exhausted (and terrified) just watching them. Not a word of English. I put out tons of ice water, they’d wave & smile, and they cleaned up every last nail & piece of debris.</p>
<p>It’s a very tough issue. I imagine it is very insulting if one is assumed to be an illegal just because one has poor English skills and earns a living in labor intensive jobs. Just as members of any ethnic group are not thrilled to be thought of as [insert ethnic stereotype.] I support legal immigration, but how as a consumer can I know my contractors & businesses I deal with are doing the right thing? I believe employment verification is a very important role of government & would support strict penalties for violators.</p>