<p>Hi</p>
<p>I just wanted to write a quick one, could someone please provide an opinion?
Any scale is fine, I’m not sure which really helps more, maybe just a 0-6.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Technology promises to make our lives easier, freeing up time for leisure pursuits. But the rapid pace of technological innovation and the split second processing capabilities of computers that can work virtually nonstop have made all of us feel rushed. We have adopted the relentless pace of the very machines that were supposed to simplify our lives, with the result that, whether at work or play, people do not feel like their lives have changed for the better.</p>
<p>Adapted from Karen Finucan</p>
<p>Do changes that make our lives easier not necessarily make them better? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observations.</p>
<p>Changes that make our lives easier never end up making them better. The cell phone was developed to simplify calling. Now, it has developed into a habit and indispensable tool that plays a greater role in parenting than parents themselves do. It has simplified calling, yet developed into an integrated part of everyone’s existence and instead of the phone being picked up to call someone, now the tables have turned- it is now the phone that beckons to the person to be picked up. Everything along the path of change to simplify life only destroys its complex and slower aspects. Ultimately this only produces more integration in these technologies in peoples lives and it no longer only makes ones life easier- it becomes a part of life. Life then, has not gotten “better”. If it becomes ingrained and integrated and branches to every part, no longer does it make something easier, but is an entire aspect of life.
Furthermore, it is a bad aspect of life. Just as people can lead impoverished lives these changes for simplification lead people to emotionally impoverished lives, depriving them of thought, and replacing the human interaction with technology’s far-reaching roots.</p>
<p>Well now reading it over for the first time I see a lot of problems, but this is the default version.
I can’t seem to avoid some of these problems that can be solved on a first read-through, though.</p>
<p>Oh and just a side question, I’m wondering if it’s a good idea not to seriously base my essay off of the quote. Isn’t the quote really just there to explain what direction the actual question takes, and doesn’t really well, your essay doesn’t really have to directly talk about it?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>