<p>Article from the Houston Chronicle, 17 March 2007.
Centered on Texas schools, but nevertheless interesting.
<a href=“http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4640395.html[/url]”>http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4640395.html</a></p>
<p>Article from the Houston Chronicle, 17 March 2007.
Centered on Texas schools, but nevertheless interesting.
<a href=“http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4640395.html[/url]”>http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4640395.html</a></p>
<p>I actually really like this idea, as long as there’s not deception or exploitation going on. As it is now – with the small exception of athletic recruitment & a more recent phenomenon of academic likely letters – the college pursuit is 95% on the part of the student. (Nat’l Merit is merely massive mailing based on scores, not suitability.) It could reduce the # of random applications to have more mutuality in the picture. And anything that reduces the number of total apps in the system is a good thing, in my book.</p>