<p>My school recently announced the valedictorian and co-salutatorians, which has caused some minor issues that could potentially grow. Despite the lack of an exact tie, my school declared the students ranked 2nd and 3rd to be co-salutatorians. The difference in GPA is approximately 0.04 - a small, but still noticeable difference. The valedictorian’s GPA is either .01 or .12 higher than the person ranked 2nd (there’s still a discrepancy over whether or not Health was counted, and GPAs aren’t officially available yet). Obviously, all 3 worked equally as hard. But is the difference small enough to warrant giving a title to the person who is 3rd? For reference, the person who is 4th is around 1.3 points lowers than the person who is 3rd. So there’s a fairly large difference there.</p>
<p>I don’t really have an opinion either way. I see the logic of both sides: the GPAs were so close, so the person in 3rd deserves recognition. On the other hand, the person in 2nd did earn the higher GPA, and therefore deserves the title of salutatorian, and shouldn’t have to share it. What do you think?</p>