<p>It irks me that campus visits weigh heavily in some admission decisions. Sure, in a perfect world, all prospective students would visit campus BEFORE applying. But finances and other logistics (sports, weekend jobs, heavy course load, family illness, etc.) prevent some students from getting to all the campuses that they would like to see. And, perhaps ironically, students may choose to visit the schools that they are lukewarm about applying to rather than their top choices. If you think about it, this makes sense. The kid from Chicago who has known for much of his life that he wants to go to Penn may decide to spring for a pricey trip to Philadelphia only if the Ivy League college–a “Reach” school–favors him with a yes. But if he’s deciding between several other colleges as his “Realistic” and “Safe” options, he is wise to visit those before winnowing down his list, and they may even be closer to home and less costly and cumbersome to visit.</p>
<p>In addition, most admission officials these days acknowledge that there are a growing number of “stealth” applicants… students who apply to their institutions but whose names don’t turn up on mailing lists and interview or tour rosters. Stealth applicants may be VERY interested and will accept offers of admission. But these are students who aren’t able to visit for numerous reasons (such as those cited above) or who DID in fact visit but who bunked with a cousin or a friend who also provided a customized tour. I always advise high school students who make their own campus visit plans to check in with the admission office while there or, if it’s over a weekend when the office is closed, to let their regional rep know about the trip. But my advice reaches only a tiny fraction of teenagers who make these under-the-radar visits. Such visits can, of course, be an excellent way to view a campus because the guests are not meeting only with campus ambassadors who were hand-picked by the admission office. But, nonetheless, when a visit doesn’t go on the record, it can hurt the applicant. </p>
<p>Even when a college claims that “Demonstrated Interest” does NOT affect admission outcomes, a committee discussion may include whether or not the student came to campus. By indicating that interest does not play a role in final verdicts, I suspect that some popular colleges are trying to innoculate themselves against an onslaught of the suck-up messages that came into vogue a decade or more ago when the word got out that showing one’s love could be critical. (“Dear Dean, When I woke up this morning, Duke was on my mind …”) </p>
<p>I’ve also heard many high school students (and parents) claim that they prefer to gather their college knowledge from independent sources (such as College Confidential)
rather than from the propaganda that the school itself provides. Thus, if it appears that a prospective student isn’t opening admission office emails or admissions portals, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the student isn’t eagerly foraging for information elsewhere.</p>
<p>So, as the mother of a high school junior, I instruct my son to open all the e-mail he gets from his target colleges, to RSVP to college events–even when he can’t attend–and to make certain that his campus visits are
duly noted in admission offices. Admittedly, I feel a bit disingenuous at times–especially when I encourage him to click on email messages that he probably won’t even read. But I will restrict the number of colleges that my son ultimately applies to. His final list will be short and manageable, and he’s definitely on board with that plan. So if he gets unexpected bad news at decision time, at least we’ll know that it wasn’t because admission folks thought he wasn’t interested.</p>
<p>When my son was born, 17 years ago, I was convinced that–by the time he was ready to go to college–this crazy process would be much saner and less stressful than it was back then. But, sadly, I fear it’s only gotten worse. </p>