<p>Would some people who have got accepted into top schools post here their transcripts. thanks</p>
<p>They will generally follow a pattern of performing very well in an extremely rigorous courseload. I’m not sure what you’ll glean from seeing disparate HS transcripts…</p>
<p>There’s no way I’ll post my transcript here for you but most people would have a lot of AP/IB classes like T26E4 said.</p>
<p>rwang,</p>
<p>I suggest you go through the recent ED/EA Official Decision threads on CC of some of the top schools you are interested in. In these threads, the accepted, deferred and rejected, post their profiles. </p>
<p>What you will find is that nearly all candidates have outstanding stats in terms of GPA, rigor of courses, SATs, etc. and it is often quite hard to tell the difference between those who get in from those who don’t on the basis of these “stats”. </p>
<p>Above a certain very high threshold, which most everybody meets or exceeds, the difference appears to be in the “intangibles”, which only the adcoms can truly discern (they have the complete application).</p>
<p>There is a tendency to overweight grades and scores (the tangibles) and to underemphasize the intangibles as reflected in ECs, spoecial talents, essays and recommendations.</p>