<p>You’d be surprised how much money does come into play in the rankings.</p>
<p>“…average spending per full-time-equivalent student on instruction, research, public service, academic support, student services, institutional support, and operations and maintenance (for public institutions only)”</p>
<p>“The average percentage of undergraduate alumni of record who donated money to the college or university.”</p>
<p>“The average faculty pay and benefits are adjusted for regional differences in cost of living.”</p>
<p>How much they paid US News? None. They just have a lot of support from endowments.</p>
<p>The US News rankings focus on a lot of factors not as related to academics like financial resources (10%), alumni giving (5%) and faculty resources (20%) which is comprised of things like faculty compensation, class size, and student/faculty ratio. Private schools will naturally have higher marks in these categories simply because they have more support financially. And by financially I mean this in the best way because the more resources you have, the more you can improve.</p>
<p>I’m not mad about the rankings–we’re in a tight spot budget-wise. If you read about UCLA’s endowments, all you’d see is decrease here and decrease there. It’s saddening, really.</p>
<p>
</a></p>
<p>We can’t rely on the just government for money. Now it’s all about help from the alumni too. So graduate and give back! Hahaha.</p>
<p>It’s a different story if you wanted to strictly talk about worldwide academic rankings, though. Hint: check out THE QS rankings and their methodology. ;)</p>