<p>So in science, what is a good strategy for the time given? I mean 35 minutes for 7 experiments! That timing is horrible. In math, you get 60 minutes for 60 EASY questions. Why can’t they have more time for science, as it is more visual/interpretive? In reading, I liked that 3 min/day book for reading, but what is a good number of questions to get done per passage when the passage is EXTREMELY hard and confusing? I like the strategy to answer the vocab and inferences first. How about you?</p>
<p>I hear ya…science is a killer
what I did was jump directly to the questions and based on what they ask, I would then look at the charts and stuff looking only for what was relevant to each question</p>
<p>usually, they try to throw you off by giving you extraneous information/background for you to read through so for once, ignore your curiosity to read that crap and attempt to only look at what is needed to answer the questions =P</p>