<p>Hmm…
I’m the editor of our school paper and I know these comments and I know how much they hurt… because it’s your baby…</p>
<p>When I started being the editor 5 years ago, our paper sucked. (which was probably the reason such a young and unexperienced person could become an editor…)
Well, I was naive and I wanted to change things. I met with some friends and we sat down and talked and researched and prepared, and the summer hols went by.</p>
<p>There was something we have never been: A newspaper.</p>
<p>For a newspaper you write articles.
You are not a language class.
You don’t write pro-con-essays or stuff like that. You don’t write beautiful sentences.
This isn’t English. This is journalism.</p>
<p>Simple, populistic language doesn’t mean that the paper is not sophisticated.
Look into big boulevard papers: I have never seen better journalists than there…
Your goal is not to show that you are good at writing. Your goal is to get readers.</p>
<p>Wanna know what my first headline was?
“This paper sucks.”
There was just this headline on a barely G-rated picture, which showed a couple in a bed.</p>
<p>I will never forget the astonished looks of my classmates…
and everyone opened that paper.
“says our football star Adam X.”</p>
<p>This was our moment. It was risky, it was daring, but we got our chance: They looked into the paper. They wanted to know what this article was about.
Of course, this is something you can only pull off once. It has to work - and it gives you a chance to introduce a revamped paper. One single chance.</p>
<p>Our paper sucked, so we changed everything. We changed the way we wrote (populistic, with strong opinions, entertaining -not facts, but fun).
We changed the selection of our articles (Who reads book reviews? Our paper was written for the masses - and the masses wanted links to funny youtube videos and …).
We changed our layout (short articles, lots of pictures with people you recognize, catchy headlines).
And we started to see the paper as a two-way thing:
We started to have opinion polls online, which we published, we printed reactions from readers (even a lot of negative stuff), we started a photo contest (topic: boys dressed as girls), we started to give awards for the stupidest homework assignment of the month, the funniest quote from a teacher, the student with the most detentions ,…
It sounds a bit drastic, and I only remember thinking: It’s happening! It’s really happening!
Of course, the attention faded, when it wasn’t new any more. They still discussed our articles and they still sent angry emails and teachers still complained…
This is enough for us.
If somebody gets angry about us, we managed to raise his emotions. That’s great. We don’t want to please them. We just want them to read.</p>
<p>My post is getting longer and longer… Let me just give you a few tips on the selection:
People like recurring things. They like their monthly
comment by the editor, especially if it’s sarcastic and funny and witty. They love sarcasm and witty things. </p>
<p>They hate to read known facts.
Let me give an example: There was a huge discussion about discipline in our school. Everybody knows that students are allowed to do this and that some think they should have more rights and some don’t and …
that’s boring.
I read the newspaper because I want to be entertained.
I want to feel something, I want to listen to somebodys’ anger or I want to smile about somebodys ideas or I want to get angry because that stupid guy writes such bull****.
I want opinions, I want to know what the cutest football player (whom everybody knows) thinks about the new rules, I want to know why the class president thinks he is being unfairly treated…
I don’t like articles in my papers, which say: “On the one hand… on the other hand…”
Known facts belong into a fact box, as simply as that. They don’t need to bore people.
Unknown facts (that covers articles about which aren’t school-related) can be written into articles, but again, numbers and stuff like that doesn’t belong in there. Look at the big newspapers…</p>
<p>People don’t care about the activities in which they aren’t involved.
<em>Nerdy nerd</em> has won some <em>nerdy contest</em>. We are happy.
I always tell my journalists: There is no sex in it!
Ever read an article about the oscars?
Ever tried adapting that concept to a nerd contest?
It does work.</p>
<p>Finally, every article should have a message and an emotion-goal.
What do I mean with message? Imagine you are sitting in your classroom and somebody shouts from the door: What are you reading? And you look up and shout back: You know that strange kid which always sits alone? Imagine this - he won a chess contest - and only got a f***ing t-shirt!
If you read an article and can’t shout back the message, your article is probably not very clear.
The second thing I mentioned was the emotion-goal: What to you want people to feel after reading your article? Astonishment? Amusement? Anger?
It may be anything - but: I want them to feel informed. That’s no feeling…</p>
<p>Claire
(sorry for my grammar - I’m German)</p>