<p>[Ethics</a>, Everyday-Style | The Cornell Daily Sun](<a href=“http://cornellsun.com/section/opinion/content/2010/08/31/ethics-everyday-style]Ethics”>Ethics, Everyday-Style - The Cornell Daily Sun)</p>
<p>Personally, I feel people are getting a bit bent out of shape over an column, but to each his own.</p>
<p>It’s the advice column type deal, right? I can’t see where the controversy is; did you link to the original by mistake?</p>
<p>That is the original, you can see in the comments. They link to a few articles that commented on it:
[Autostraddle</a> — It’s Hard Out Here For A Lesbian In College, So Lay Off The ‘Ethical’ Advice](<a href=“http://www.autostraddle.com/hard-out-here-for-a-college-lesbian-58527/]Autostraddle”>It’s Hard Out Here For A Lesbian In College, So Lay Off The ‘Ethical’ Advice | Autostraddle)
[Advice</a> Columnist Tells Gay Sorority Girl To Out Herself](<a href=“Advice Columnist Tells Gay Sorority Girl To Out Herself”>Advice Columnist Tells Gay Sorority Girl To Out Herself)</p>
<p>Oh, thanks! I usually don’t look at comments on newspaper articles because they… scare me. </p>
<p>Anyway, yeah, I get it now. “Gay people are spooky!” “No they’re not!” “Waah!” “Blaaah!” Shocking!</p>
<p>An opinion article is an opinion article, whatever. I find the fact that the Sun actually published an article that reads like this to be far more offensive, and frankly embarrassing:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I remember reading that column and thinking that I totally disagreed with that response. now that I’m reading it again, I think the autostaddle analysis right on. I’ve been quite unimpressed by the Sun columns so far this year in general though, so I hardly gave it a second thought at the time.</p>
<p>wow i can’t believe something liek that got so controversial… the editors answer to the sexuality post isn’t great but the responses were pretty dumb too.</p>
<p>and i dont see anything wrong with the ice cream article</p>