<p>The reaction from Pakistan is somewhat intriguing. I’m being polite.</p>
<p>[Here[/url</a>] is a statement by a Taliban commander. It’s a mix of obfuscation, evasion and racist nonsense.</p>
<p>[url=<a href=“In Article On Pakistani Website, MEMRI South Asia Director Analyzes Taliban's Emerging Strategy Against Liberal Journalists In Pakistan | MEMRI”>In Article On Pakistani Website, MEMRI South Asia Director Analyzes Taliban's Emerging Strategy Against Liberal Journalists In Pakistan | MEMRI]Here[/url</a>] is an article highlighting Taliban propaganda about Malala. It says her words were weapons so, “[T]he Taliban think that Malala’s diaries were aimed at defaming Islam. ‘Those who say that she was barehanded and unarmed,’ the pamphlet notes, ‘are trying to hoodwink the people. Malala was fighting against the Taliban with words and pen.’”</p>
<p>[url=<a href=“Former Pakistani Interior Minister Hamid Nawaz: Attack On Malala Yousafzai 'May Be The Handiwork Of American Agents'; Urdu Daily Alleges American Conspiracy Behind Malala's Anti-Taliban Diaries | MEMRI”>Former Pakistani Interior Minister Hamid Nawaz: Attack On Malala Yousafzai 'May Be The Handiwork Of American Agents'; Urdu Daily Alleges American Conspiracy Behind Malala's Anti-Taliban Diaries | MEMRI]Here[/url</a>] is a favorite, Pakistan’s former Interior Minister saying the attack “may be the handiwork of American agents”. If you scroll down, you get an article from a Pakistani paper which starts off, “Malala Yousafzai’s diaries against the Taliban were written by the then-BBC Peshawar bureau chief. He wrote this diary in the name of Gul Makai, one of his relatives, and got it released by the BBC after consultation with Malala’s father.” The rest of the article is in this vein. Very creative.</p>
<p>There are dozens of these, including articles that discuss how Malala couldn’t have been shot because a girl can’t survive being shot in the head and ones that say she was only in this for herself. A favorite is essentially a joint release by the leading “terror” groups in Pakistan. If you want to understand what this entire thing is about, [url=<a href=“Document: TTP-IMU Joint Statement Cites Prophet Muhammad's Orders And Pashtun Cultural Tradition To Justify Attack On Pakistani Teenager Malala Yousafzai | MEMRI”>Document: TTP-IMU Joint Statement Cites Prophet Muhammad's Orders And Pashtun Cultural Tradition To Justify Attack On Pakistani Teenager Malala Yousafzai | MEMRI]this</a> excerpt](<a href=“In Letter, Taliban Commander Adnan Rasheed Urges Malala Yousafzai To Return To Pakistan And Attend A Madrassa, Saying: 'Had You Been Shot... [By] The Americans In A Drone Attack, Would The World Have Ever Heard Updates On Your Medical Status?' | MEMRI”>In Letter, Taliban Commander Adnan Rasheed Urges Malala Yousafzai To Return To Pakistan And Attend A Madrassa, Saying: 'Had You Been Shot... [By] The Americans In A Drone Attack, Would The World Have Ever Heard Updates On Your Medical Status?' | MEMRI) says it pretty well: </p>
<p>"The present war underway in the world is a war between two faiths and a struggle between two religions. A war is continuing around the world presently between religiosity and irreligiousness. One says put on clothes; the other says don’t [do that], remain naked, it is your right. One says maintain the veil; the other says no, don’t violate women’s rights. One says don’t do sinful [sexual] things [because] this would destroy the race; the other says it is not so, it is your fundamental right, do whatever you want to do.</p>
<p>"One says acquire education; the other says no, in the name of education and art, do immoral acts and indulge in dancing and singing, obscenity, music and jumping. One says be steadfast to your religion; the other says no, keep religion and the world separated and keep mullahs away from government.</p>
<p>"One says give respect to the elders; the other says no, insult revered persons and, god forbid, commit blasphemy against Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, because this is the era of freedom [of expression] and everyone has a right to exercise his/her opinion. One says give education to girls [and] take care of their veils; the other says no, appear on TV and give interviews to unknown males [the males with whom marriage is permissible] also. One says protect women; the other says no, instead mock those Taliban and Mujahideen too who stop Muslim girls from obscenity, immorality and Western civilization. In short, it is a war of two faiths.</p>
<p>“Now we come towards the real issue, and that is ‘Malala’; and behind her cover the infidels and their agents are spiting venom against the Taliban continuously day and night. We would like to say something on this issue which is being raised by the pro-West people: Malala is a doll [puppet] in their hands.”</p>
<p>The rest explains why she needed to be killed.</p>