<p>
</p>
<p>I explicitly used the words “could have”, as in: you could have googled it. Meaning I did not say you did or did not go to A&M, I left that to be interpreted by the reader. You were the one that assumed I did not believe you. All I said was I really didn’t care if you did or did not go to A&M, which is the truth. Try learning how to read before attempting at correcting someone.</p>
<p>P.S. There is no proper or improper way to use internet forum quotations tags, LOL. They’re used when referencing what people have wrote, which is what I did. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And your point? Does the majority always express the correct opinion? When the majority of America voted in Bush was that the correct opinion? When the majority of Germany stood behind Hitler was that the correct opinion? Opinions are like *******s, everyone has one.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Did you ever “get out” at A&M? Or did you just have a few bad experiences with A&M girls, and decided to give up? Go to a party at A&M, you’ll soon realize that A&M has plenty of women whom aren’t looking for serious relationships. By the way, just because everyone does it doesn’t make it right. Why do most people want to settle down when they get older? Is it because they are more mature? Does that make A&M, as you view it, a more “mature” university? I’m not saying this is the case, but just because A&M has people whom are ready at that point in their life to “settle down” doesn’t make them bad people to engage with. Even the most liberal schools are bound to have atleast a few people who are like this. Your sample size at A&M, to me, seems to be quite limited.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You don’t have to “move quickly” to be or end up in a “serious relationship”. I’m not sure where you got that idea. Me and my current gf moved VERY slow (on her behalf as well, woah!), and we are in a serious relationship. To me, you speak as if in the past you didn’t want to be exclusive, and you encountered women who did. You’ll encounter women like that all around the nation.</p>