<p>I am undecided. Things could go either way at this point. Or they could head in a completely different direction. What do you think I should do?</p>
<p>If it’s about the elongated you know what, you should really do what you need to do, before it heads in a completely different directory.</p>
<p>Is this a trick question?</p>
<p>Ah, another meta-thread!</p>
<p>The answer is obvious, mantori.suzuki. You should follow the right path. If you follow the wrong path, all will be lost. Your life and your children’s lives will be awful forever. You must chose the right path. How do you know which is the right path? It’s the one I am on, of course. If it were wrong I wouldn’t be on it.</p>
<p>You can never go wrong with a double mctwist 1260.</p>
<p>Gold medal for blankmind! =)</p>
<p>Go for the quadruple.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>However, even when lost there can be multiple paths, all followed simultaneously. It only ends once, anything else is progress.</p>
<p>Don’t do the quadruple. Work on GOE.</p>
<p>The answer is indubitably - yes.</p>
<p>I recently heard of the term “vaguebooking” - which is posting an intentionally vague Facebook status (“wondering if it’s all worth it”) for the express purpose of getting people to ask what’s wrong. I’m sure a sharper mind than mine can come up with a similar term to describe vaguebooking on CC. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, mantori-suzuki, I’d zig where others zag. Or maybe I’d zag where others zig. Depends if you’re facing north or south.</p>
<p>42.</p>
<p>Hey, I know where my towel’s at. :)</p>
<p>The answer to life, the universe and everything. </p>
<p>“Don’t forget to bring a towel.”</p>
<p>Cheers, you hoopy froods!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>But wouldn’t you agree that this is wise if, and only if, they are all less travelled?</p>
<p>Another path thread.</p>
<p>Doesn’t anyone utilize the search function?</p>
<p>Clearly, the most direct path is quite often the most convoluted. There is much to be said for aimless wandering, having no bearings, misinterpreting signs and going in circles. Choosing which fork in the road to take may lead one to ignore the spoon or knife one may encounter a bit further on. </p>
<p>Those who put the pedal to the metal often can’t see the forest for the trees.</p>
<p>Imagine if clocks moved in a linear progression rather than on a rotational axis. </p>
<p>Ponder that for a while.</p>
<p>And remember, it’s not necessarily the goal, but the journey.</p>
<p>Or the price of the ticket.</p>
<p>Kurt Vonnegut (I think so, but am too lazy to look it up) wrote: Make all decisions according to 3 principles, as one will always apply: “sinistration” (the path to the left), “alphabetization” (a through z with earlier letters the best choices), and “chronology” (earlier is better). </p>
<p>Wait, I think I scrambled the order, so using these principles will re-prioritize:</p>
<p>alphabetization, chronology, sinistration</p>
<p>But wait, I mentioned sinistration first, so when re-prioritizing I decide:</p>
<p>sinistration, chronology, alphabetization…</p>
<p>I guess I need to know the order in which Vonnegut wrote these 3. Dang. Gotta hit the books again. I’m lost.</p>
<p>Never an adviser or advisee be.</p>
<p>Look before you leap…a stitch in time saves nine…a rolling stone gathers no moss…lose weight with a low carb diet…lose weight with a low fat diet…brush your hair 100 strokes…an apple a day… and my personal favorite</p>
<p>its the early worm that gets caught.</p>
<p>Follow your heart.</p>
<p>Follow your spleen.</p>